View Full Version : Formula 161 vs 162

21st December 2008, 07:42 PM
Hy Remi or Tiesda,
I think this q. is for one of you. There's a lot of discusions about 161 vs 162. One thing I never read: what are the real diffences between them?
I mean scoop rockerline / bottomshape / V (or zero V?) from nose to tail / volumefrom nose tot tail. Of course starboard is really working these things out working on the formula 163.

Greatz, Rambo.