View Full Version : Formula 161 vs 162

24th December 2008, 01:48 AM
There's a lot of discusions about 161 vs 162. One thing I never read: what are the real diffences between them?
Can anybody tell me?
I mean scoop rockerline / bottomshape / V (or zero V?) from nose to tail / volumefrom nose tot tail. Of course starboard is really working these things out working on the formula 163.

Greatz, Rambo.