Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum > K96 vs. Futura93

Thread: K96 vs. Futura93 Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Image Verification
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
27th November 2007 07:26 PM
MortenL Thanks Ola H - I will wish me the K96 for Christmas
16th November 2007 07:55 PM
Ola_H Nothing but the smallest Futura. My wife is almost 10kg heavier, and uses my F101, but she is more of a beginner and I think she would do just as well with the 93 anyway.

With the Kombats you have more options. The 79 is not that natural with a 6.5 even at your weight, but the 89 will handle it and I think the 89 overall will be the most all round board.
16th November 2007 06:42 PM
Unregistered
Kombat and Futura

Considering the same sail sizes and conditions with MortenL which Kombat and Futura you would advice for a lighter sailor (49 Kg)?
Thank you
16th November 2007 04:55 PM
Ola_H Both boards can handle that. The K96 will do jibes and stuff with more "flair" though. The Futuras turn well, but like a longer arc. On the other hand, the Futuras are a faster and have a way of staying stably in overpower and chop. The Kombats are more lively and easier for chops hops. Both can do carving 360:s and oldschool freestyle, but the Kombat is easier and does it in a more natural way.

So, my guess is that a Kombat will suit you better.
15th November 2007 10:28 PM
Unregistered
K96 vs. Futura93

I am looking for a board to use with 4,8-6,5 - bump and jump condition. Mainly jibing, duck jibing, small jumps (maybe a forward loop) and a few freestyle attempts (old school). Which of the two will fit the best? (my weight - 82 kg)

MortenL

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 10:34 AM.