Starboard Forums

Starboard Forums (http://www.star-board-windsurfing.com/forum/index.php)
-   Ask Our Team (http://www.star-board-windsurfing.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   isonic for 7.0 (http://www.star-board-windsurfing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9645)

berg 6th October 2010 02:49 AM

isonic for 7.0
 
My weight is 83 kg.
I like to sail mt 7.0 sail very well powered.
What will be the isonic for this sail
Mostly sailed on a big lake
I like a board form the year 2009 and if it is I like to hear why 2010 or 2011 will be better

Like to hear

Berg

Remi 6th October 2010 04:55 PM

Hi Berg,

The option of only one board and one sail at your weight, the best board for this will be the iSonic 90

All the best

berg 6th October 2010 11:40 PM

What about the 94 from 2009?
Like to hear

Berg

Remi 7th October 2010 04:42 AM

Hi Berg,

If you are looking for second hand board yes go for it. 2010 this board was a success and close the performance gap that we have before between the 101 and the 86.

All the best

berg 9th October 2010 02:53 PM

What is the difference between 2009 and 2010 isonic 94. Is it that the 2009 has a higher rockerline in the nose and a longer flat in the rear?

What will be the difference in sailing for a 85 kg like me

Thanks

Berg

kvda 9th October 2010 10:18 PM

The 2010 isonic 94 is a different concept, it's a 'small 101'. The older 94's are classic shaped slalomboards, relatively taller and less wide. I'd go for the 2010 94!! Bigger range.

kvda 9th October 2010 10:20 PM

By the way, for me -95 kgs- the 101 is perfect with 7.0

berg 10th October 2010 01:07 AM

thanks foor the info.
To me the 94 from 2010 sems to have a very low nose , and I think it will catch sooner the the 94. I do not have the experience. But I can get a 94 from 2009 for cheap and try this.
Today I saw the 2010 in the shop and realy liked the tail with the short flat planing

I had the 101 from 2007, and wanted a litlle smaller, wish I never sold it. since than the shit and search and doubts started.

Well we shall see


Berg

Remi 10th October 2010 01:56 PM

Hi Berg,

In your case definitely go for the isonic 94 2010. The 2009 was nice but not enough performances with a narrow range compare to the 2010 one.

The 2010 have the same rocker as the iSonic 101 2009/2010, so basically it's a smaller 101.

All the best

ThierryP 23rd October 2010 06:57 PM

Berg,

The 2009 94 was a dog, the 2010 94 was a rocket, an absolute peach. Go for the 2010, no question.


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 05:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.