View Single Post
Old 14th May 2010, 01:54 PM   #3
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 23

Thanks, I will like a translation. But I think it's a to small differanse between the 94 and the slim 86 (The 2009 94 is and up "scaled" 86, and the slim is identical only thinner). The slim is 243 x 56.5 and the (2009) 94 is 243 x 59 . I understand that the speed boards are more difficult to jibe, but do you think they are unsuitable for choppy conditions ? (I love the my 94, and it's not difficult to controll).The 2009 94 it's a mutch more speed oriented than the 2010 94 witch is a down scaled 101.

morten.g is offline   Reply With Quote