View Single Post
Old 5th March 2007, 08:13 AM   #6
steveC
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 639
Default RE: Tectonic for isonic

Hi Ian,

A very interesting response to AJ's concerns. Definitely, very informative and extensive in nature. It clearly offers a great deal to think about, and it raises a lot of pertinent question at the real heart of things. It's got me thinking about my possible alternatives. I like this kind of detail.

steveC is offline   Reply With Quote