View Single Post
Old 10th April 2007, 02:46 AM   #3
MA_Pete
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 79
Default RE: Why no Tufskin Apollo?

Tiesda:

Thanks for the reply. I am aware of the Formula Experience Class and the requirements for ASA and the 4 year design cycle.

My inquiry is:

1) Why didn't you make the Apollo available in a less expensive construction, Tufskin or Technora, for recreational sailors looking for early planing?

2) Will the FE160 plane much earlier than a F-Type 158?

I want to go for earliest possible planing on a Formula type board, but not sure if I can justify the Apollo price tag.

Thanks!

-Pete
MA_Pete is offline   Reply With Quote