RE: Why no Tufskin Apollo?
Thanks for the reply. I am aware of the Formula Experience Class and the requirements for ASA and the 4 year design cycle.
My inquiry is:
1) Why didn't you make the Apollo available in a less expensive construction, Tufskin or Technora, for recreational sailors looking for early planing?
2) Will the FE160 plane much earlier than a F-Type 158?
I want to go for earliest possible planing on a Formula type board, but not sure if I can justify the Apollo price tag.