|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 459
|
I`m pretty convinced that board tests (especially in 125 litre+ market) are just as much a test of the fins than the boards themselves.
Eg 07 Tests of Tabou Rocket and Goya FXR Tabou Rocket (125 litres) was found to go upwind along lines of a Formula (their quote) but feel quite directional.It could also handle a sail of upto 8.5 metres . The Goya on the other hand was found to be far more"playfull;not as good upwind;later planing but jumped and carved better.They reckoned biggest sail was 7 (ish) Boards are within a couple of cm in width; Goya a bit longer) Now the good bit; the Tabou was fitted with a 46cm Slalom fin and the Goya with a 36cm MFC(Which I reckon offers less drive than my Northshore 32) Its a bit like testing 2 cars and saying one outcorners the other but its fitted with slicks ??? Why not test the boards with a fin which matches the sail size ??? How on earth is anybody supposed to draw any conclusion which such a blatant disregard for objectivity? How would Goya go upwind with the 46 ??? How playfull would Tabou be with the 36?? |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|