|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Greetings from the winter cold Denmark.
I have for a time look at the Futura 101 in 2010 woodcarbon edition. This board, I thought would be my one-board solution and replace my current F2 eliminator vol: 103 and 62.5 width. My question is whether it is realistic that it can carry my current sails : Hellcat 5.2, 6.2 and 7.2, which I use in winds between 17 to 31 knots. (The Eliminator have problems with 7.2) and does the width 65,5 on the Futura gets to big for windy days +26 knots ? Or should I look for a two board solution? Maybe isonic .. I sail on flat water sometimes with a little or heavy chop, no waves and a GPS. And have reached 26 knots as my max speed, working slowly against the 30 knots ![]() I am in the intermidiate area. Waterstart, harness use etc. is okay. But still working on those carve jibes and gaining speed. My current weight is 80 kg. Regards From Claus Denmark |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 173
|
I do have a futura 101 (2008) wich is slightly different, but nevertheless it's a futura 101, yes it will handle 5.2-6.2 and 7.2 Hellcats. 6.2 and 7.2 will be great. I would go for the wood edition in smaller sizes by the way, a more soft feeling, more comfort.
But, +26 knots is pretty much wind, and two boards (or more) is of course always better in terms of Time on the Water. (that's why I own 5... and some old boards I cant say goodbye but wich I don't use anymore) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AUSTRIA, Lake Neusiedler
Posts: 297
|
6 to 7 m sails work great on the 101. Indeed is the iSONIC 101 a relatively small board and can take a lot of wind, especially when itīs flat. If itīs super light and you would like to sail, too you can pimp the board with a 40 to 42 cm fin and use a 7,8 to 8,0, which is fine.
Would guess itīs a good choice. Chris
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks kvda and Chris for the fast reply.
I am impressed ![]() But, Chris, do you not think, the isonic 101 will be too technical for my current level? When I am developing and learning power jibes. But I can see that is86 and is101 will do the work for a period of time and years for me. That is101 is so cool, so maybe.. My best greetings Claus |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AUSTRIA, Lake Neusiedler
Posts: 297
|
Guess not, Claus. You replace a 103 l board with a board, which is by 1,5 cm wider, has a thin flat nose. If you combine the board with the 86 you could take the iSONIC 111 and you could cover a super wide windrange. The 111 can carry sails up to 8,5 easily and as the smallest size you could use the 6,2 when itīs flat.
The 86 is a machine, which works great from 5,0 to 6,7. So, think about, where you sail and in which windconditions most of the time. As a one board solution the 101 would be good. YOu can have fun in 15 knots and in 25 as well. Hope it helps! Chris
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Last edited by Chris Pressler; 9th January 2010 at 03:51 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hey Chris.
And thanks again. Must say I hooked on the is101. I have searched in the free forum and was a little confused. Can you use no-cam sails on isonic 101 or only cam-sails ? But everything goes ![]() Regards Claus |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AUSTRIA, Lake Neusiedler
Posts: 297
|
Hi Claus,
you are right, forgot about you do not have any Cam sails in your quiver. I sailed all combos: Futura 101 with no cam, Futura 101 with cam, iSonic 101 with cam, iSonic with no cam, all worked well But guess you are right, I was too much in the iSONIC world: Futura 101 with no Cam is the better choice if I rethink it again! Chris
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for the answers
![]() Claus |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 173
|
that's true, for the hellcats i would go for the futura. The isonics need to be sailed powered up, futura does the job more easily with nocam freeride sails.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Starboard for the article iSonic vs Futura
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| iSonic 131 WoodCarbon 2010 | Marko CRO169 | Kevin`s Corner | 13 | 3rd October 2010 12:26 PM |
| Futura 93 2009 vs Futura 93 2010 | van | Ask Our Team | 6 | 5th May 2010 07:50 PM |
| Futura 101, 2010. | Unregistered | Free Forum | 0 | 8th January 2010 04:16 PM |
| Song in the Futura 2010 video | Chris - H2Osurfer | Free Forum | 0 | 18th September 2009 06:09 AM |
| Underside colour: 2010 Futura | Unregistered | Free Forum | 0 | 27th August 2009 06:51 AM |