|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 70
|
PG, from what you are saying we would then have to pay 200€/300$ extra for an iS144 WC (on top of the 1.660€ / 2200$ for the iS144 Wood), to plan 0,5 knot earlier??
Both in the Forum and website, SB folks are filling us with a lot of marketing about the "premium" WC construction. For example, in a thread less than a Y ago, IAN FOX mentioned: "The Futuras (and iSonics) can definitely be made lighter in Wood+Carbon tech, which offers an advantage in earlier planing in lighter winds and on flatter water." I would NOT mind paying the difference if someone from SB could tell us what were their test results? I just brought up the example of iS144 WC<>Wood with a 10m2 - same sailor + location - would it be planning 2-3 knots earlier then it does make a difference... |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| futura; isonic |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Futura 155: Best light-medium wind sail/fin? | johnd12 | Free Forum | 0 | 8th April 2010 02:46 AM |
| light wind board to replace futura 133 w | DJluc | Ask Our Team | 1 | 25th August 2009 05:45 AM |
| Futura 122 or 133 for light wind conditions? | Stef68 | Ask Our Team | 8 | 28th April 2009 10:37 PM |
| Isonic 133 or 144 for ultra light wind | Tur53 | Ask Our Team | 7 | 8th November 2007 11:47 AM |
| Isonic 115 & Light-wind setup | Daniel B | Kevin`s Corner | 2 | 28th May 2007 10:51 PM |