|27th November 2010, 09:14 AM||#1|
Join Date: Nov 2008
The incredibly unique iSonic question thread!
I have a 2006 starboard iSonic 133. I like it a lot.
Recently I saw a rider with the iSonic's predecessor, the Hypersonic. I noticed the huge difference in bottom shape, the concaves and lack of cutaways.
I'm wondering what the design rationale behind the concaves was and why they were discontinued.
Might be a "Grass-is greener" observation, but I sail in choppy to very choppy flat water and great lakes conditions. The iSonic is a rough ride in these conditions, but I would expect the same from any wide board. Would the Hyper offer any benefits in these conditions?
Also I chipped the trailing edge of the Deboicet fin, what's the best way to deal with it?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|stripped thread 2010 quad||john151||Ask Our Team||5||5th October 2010 03:36 PM|
|The "Not Another iSonic Thread" Thread||k.lauman||Ask Our Team||8||23rd April 2009 06:20 AM|
|Damaged thread repair||Screamer||Free Forum||2||13th September 2008 10:51 PM|
|New Thread||LK||Free Forum||3||4th November 2006 08:05 AM|