|15th January 2012, 06:30 PM||#1|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Rear footstrap position.
This one is for the designers. I notice on the larger Futura's and now the Carve's the rear footstrap holes are not parallel with the centre line ( stringer line in surfing terms ). The front holes are placed wider from the centre line than the rear holes. When I had a 2008 Futura 133 I constantly hit my toes on the leading edge of the footstrap. All other board brands I looked at thus far have them parallel. Also my Kode 113 is parallel.
The odd thing is that on the Isonic 117 I now have, the footstraps are parallel to the centre line. In my opinion a lot better and the width is very similar.
Why one style on the isonic and a another on the freerides?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|'09 - '10 kode 112 single rear footstrap?||Unregistered||Free Forum||5||14th November 2010 03:53 AM|
|Futura's rear footstrap position||gu77||Ask Our Team||1||28th October 2007 05:17 PM|
|One rear footstrap on Kombat?||gu77||Ask Our Team||7||26th September 2007 11:15 AM|
|Rear footstrap position on Kombat||gu77||Ask Our Team||0||23rd August 2007 06:14 PM|
|That pesky rear footstrap||Matthew||Windsurfing School||9||26th September 2006 10:54 PM|