Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22nd September 2013, 06:34 PM   #21
Remi
STARBOARD DEVELOPMENT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2,428
Default

Hi Weber

In your case in fresh water in Guard a Lake, I will recommend the 110 but the 107 will do perfectly the job too. I will say the difference is that 110 is more light wind orientation and 107 medium wind.
Both of them will give you a lot of fun with that sail size.

All the best.
__________________
Remi

Can answer if you have any questions on this following boards :

Carve 111, 121, 131, 141, 151 & 161
Futura 93, 101, 111, 121, 131 & 141.
iSonic 80, 87, 90, 97, 107, 110, 117 & 130
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

UltraSonic 147
Formula Experience One Design
Phantom Race 377 & 377 L / 320
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Phantom 295 L :
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Formula 167 :
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Racing Serinity Cat Concept
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Remi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2013, 05:58 AM   #22
Mathias
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tailkick

Hi Remi,

Last saturday I picked up my 2 new 2014 Isonics (the 107 and 130) and as always.....think most people do :-)... they are situated in the living room for a couple of days. They look great with nice details. I measured them and what wundered me was that the boards didn't had any tailkick. I don't know how the 2013 boards looked like.........i sailed the Fanatic falcons this year which had a little kick and actually the most boards I'm measuring have some slight kick. My knowledge about it is that the board get's loose more.

Can you please tell me what's the reason to do this and what's the effect on the board. As I said maybe it was allready there in the 2013 boards but I don't know that.

Greetings from Mathias (Holland)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2013, 02:26 AM   #23
Remi
STARBOARD DEVELOPMENT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2,428
Default

Hi Mathias

Correct non of the iSonic have tail Kick but can notice also they are also the much narrow in the tail wet surface.
This replace in better way the tail kick, on top of that tail kick who can be perfect on proto can be a disaster in production. If my perfect proto had for example 3mm tail kick in production he can be 0 to 5 or 6 mm and this have very negative effect on the board.
so since some years I eliminate progressively completely tail kick on all iSonic but not only.
It make me work in different way and play a lot with outline and tuck like to find the perfect balance.
Basically better to play with this than tail kick to fix the rocker.
hope this help and let us know after your test what you feel about them.
Have fun
All the best
__________________
Remi

Can answer if you have any questions on this following boards :

Carve 111, 121, 131, 141, 151 & 161
Futura 93, 101, 111, 121, 131 & 141.
iSonic 80, 87, 90, 97, 107, 110, 117 & 130
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

UltraSonic 147
Formula Experience One Design
Phantom Race 377 & 377 L / 320
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Phantom 295 L :
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Formula 167 :
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Racing Serinity Cat Concept
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by Remi; 24th September 2013 at 02:30 AM.
Remi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2013, 08:00 AM   #24
Mathias
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tailkick

Quote:
Originally Posted by Remi View Post

Correct non of the iSonic have tail Kick but can notice also they are also the much narrow in the tail wet surface.This replace in better way the tail kick, on top of that tail kick who can be perfect on proto can be a disaster in production. If my perfect proto had for example 3mm tail kick in production he can be 0 to 5 or 6 mm and this have very negative effect on the board. so since some years I eliminate progressively completely tail kick on all iSonic but not only. It make me work in different way and play a lot with outline and tuck like to find the perfect balance.Basically better to play with this than tail kick to fix the rocker.
hope this help and let us know after your test what you feel about them.
Have fun
All the best
Dear Remi,

Thanks for the reaction. So actually you can't entirely design/make an ultimate board because of the limitations of the production proces.

That makes me curious. If you didn't had these limitations and it would be possible to ad some tailkick..........would you do it in the 107 & 130, having in mind that the rest stays the same?

This weekend there is some wind predicted............really curious what speeds they achieve.

Aloha.

Greetings from they other side of the world.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2013, 08:14 PM   #25
Remi
STARBOARD DEVELOPMENT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2,428
Default

Hi Mathias

I will not come back to tail kick because discover that is better to work with out line and tuck line to get more performances but also a more smooth board unless I discover something new. Development have to keep your mind open for anything.
Have fun this week end.
All the best
__________________
Remi

Can answer if you have any questions on this following boards :

Carve 111, 121, 131, 141, 151 & 161
Futura 93, 101, 111, 121, 131 & 141.
iSonic 80, 87, 90, 97, 107, 110, 117 & 130
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

UltraSonic 147
Formula Experience One Design
Phantom Race 377 & 377 L / 320
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Phantom 295 L :
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Formula 167 :
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Racing Serinity Cat Concept
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Remi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2013, 05:27 PM   #26
mcross19
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Default

So the tolerance for a Starboard is +/- 3mm on tail kick? That would make a big difference to how any board feels!
mcross19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2013, 09:51 PM   #27
van
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Greece
Posts: 94
Default

Hi Remi

Congrats for a great line up this year but I have to say this 107 vs 110 choice is now more confusing than ever. I am 70kg and want a board which I will use only with a 7.8 NP Racing sail (11-18 knots on flat to choppy water). I already have a 2013 iSonic 97 as my main board for my NP 7.0 & 6.4 racing sails. And I know your recommendation will be the 110 for me but the 75cm width scares me somewhat and I think at 16-18 knots I will get bounced around a lot. To be honest I think an RRD 114 (70cm width but with extra volume) would be the perfect board for me (and correct me if I'm wrong but the extra volume over the iS 110 would make it plane pretty much the same and at 70cm wide I would have more control). But I have been a Starboard man for 7 yrs now and I'm a bit addicted to the brand. What do you say.

Regards

Van
van is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2013, 08:39 AM   #28
SeanAUS120
Dream Team Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia // Dokkum, Netherlands
Posts: 146
Send a message via Skype™ to SeanAUS120
Default

Tail kick is a funny thing ...

If I was to look at the boards that have been modified on the PWA this season (legally, just resanding/filling back to their original designed shape because they've come out of production completely wrong) it's easy to see a lot of boards - Tabou, Fanatic, RRD etc have boards being sanded by their riders and I've failed to ever see a Starboard sanded by any rider ...

Designing a board is one thing... building it is another.

Agree with Remi on all points regarding the tail kick. Easier to just not have it ;-)
__________________
GetWindsurfFit.com // The Ultimate Windsurfing Fitness Program.
SeanAUS120 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2013, 01:00 PM   #29
Markus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Color 2014 on the isonics

Hi everyone,

This has probably been discussed before, but I eanted to give my personal feedback after using Starboards for more than 10 years.

I really like the boards, bith for it's performance and design.

But what happened 2014 with the isonic design? Blue???
I know the boards werent UV resistant, I have that problem und my 2k13 isonics. But why didi you guys pick blue? Ok it might look good for people whi use Severne and like strange colors, but for me it's the worst design change you made in the boards.

Thats actually one main reason I wont buy those 2014 boards an hope for a neutral design in 2015!

Cheers
Markus
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2013, 09:19 PM   #30
kapten k
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 52
Default

If you dond like the blue. you can always get the wood version. considering you sailed starboard fo 10 years you wwould like the wood! I personally hate wood in a slalom board.. i liked the shape and innovation of starboard. but hated the wood construction for slalom boards. even my 1998 bic vivaces was carbon top and bottom.. dont like the glass bottom on smaller slalom boards either! i think all started using more glass since 2008 when carbon prices went up. The 2006 mantas are all carbon. but the 2008s had glass bottom. I dont mind the color at all. i buy board bases on shape construction and performance. I wish they all looked the same so my wife would not see when i change them! perfect for a 2011 to 2013 swap! just orderd a 2014 isonic 90 because that tail looks sick! i recon it will really perfom as a light wind speedboard also!
kapten k is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ISonic 2014 paulo56 French Forum 8 16th October 2013 07:02 PM
iSonic 2014 RAW Ask Our Team 7 19th July 2013 11:26 PM
Serenity 2013-2014? Unregistered Free Forum 24 4th July 2013 07:08 AM
fins for iSonic 107 2014 Unregistered Free Forum 0 10th June 2013 02:48 AM


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 11:11 PM.