Old 16th January 2007, 10:12 PM   #1
meg
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
Default Sails comparison

Hi Roger,

I have a line of MauiSials TR1 (10, 8.5 and 6.6) and FType 158 2006 with 65cm fin, adjustable outhaul, 100% carbon masts and carbon boom. I'm 90kg 175cm intermediate recreational sailer on inland gusty lake.

Can you please elaborate on my sails choice and if other sails like the Retro, V8, or Severne Gator will make sailing easier (weight, draft, etc).

I also want to buy a second board for higher wind above 18 knots. Can you please suggest a board which is 'friendly' and not very technical.

Thank you!!
meg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th January 2007, 12:30 PM   #2
Roger
Dream Team - School Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,100
Default RE: Sails comparison

Hi meg,
The TR-1 race sails are very nice, but for early planing on a gusty lake they may not be the best choice.
The 10.0 m2 TR-1 is definitely a formula type design, so it probably needs a bit more pumping (due to less static draft) to get going in marginal winds.
Nearly all top of the line race sails are similar.
The designers expect them to be used by very fit and skillful sailors who have the skills to pump them onto a plane in conditions many of us more "normal" sailors won't be able to get going very easily.
The Retro, Gator, and NP V8 (if you like cams) have significantly more "static draft depth" and can pull you onto a plane far more easily with very little pumping required in the same windspeed a race sail is going to need pumping.
But, as in nearly all things "windsurfing" there's a trade off here.
The flatter profile of the TR-1 race sails will allow you to go upwind higher, and provide higher top speeds. Teh cambers will allow you to sail the TR-1 very overpowered as the cams add stability.
Unfortunately, many race sail designs do not take very well to being "under rigged" to give them more draft.
The Free Race designs (Retro, Gator, V8, V6, GTX and others) have more static draft, and most can be slightly "under rigged" (less downhaul and a fully slackened adjustable outhaul) to make them even more powerful in marginal conditions.
You do have to retune them to take advantage of the full range. For higher wind, they need more downhaul and outhaul to give them better overpowered stability and range.
As far as a smaller board, will you be sailing it on your lake...?
Is the F Type 158 the only board you've had experience on?
A smaller Carve or perhaps an Isonic would be pretty good here.
The S-Type likes 16 knots and up really well.
I'd look for something in the 110-120 liter range.
It will be quite different than your F-Type right at first, but with a short "learning period" you should be able to "transition" to a smaller slalom/freeride type board quite easily.
Hope this helps,
Roger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2007, 09:59 PM   #3
meg
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
Default RE: Sails comparison

Hi Roger,
thanks for prompt reply.
I'll be sailing only on inland lakes.
So far I have only FType 158 and tried smaller board (120 l freeride F2) for a few sessions and had no problem to get planning.
I'm not a speed freak so I'm looking for a board which will give me comfortable ride at high(er) winds. Since I don't have any experience on Carve, S-Type or ISonic I heavily rely on your experienced advice. )
Thanks!
meg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 11:45 PM.