|29th January 2012, 09:44 AM||#11|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Is it sensible, to have an Futura 141-2010 and a ultrasonic 147 to each other? The difference is only 6 liters, however the chance that you will plane ealier isn't familiar with me. Can somebody say more about that? My sails are an North Warp. 11.0m2, NP-H2 9.2-7.7-6.7 and I also have an 122 Futura 2010.
Thanks for helping?
|29th January 2012, 07:20 PM||#12|
Join Date: Jan 2009
When you have volume enough, it's the width that counts for early planing.
US147 <-> FU141:
93 <-> 80 or 65 <-> 50 at the tail.
The length of th FU141 is 246 compared to 240 of the US147 which facilitates a more passive way of getting on the plane, but I think the US will definitely plane earlier, go better through lulls and point better.
IS87 / IS101 / RRD114 / US147
|30th January 2012, 09:54 PM||#13|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Tail width at one foot off (OFO) is the keyword here. With an 11.0 m2 sail, forget the Futura 141. The UltraSonic is a perfect match with such a large sail.
Conversely, the Futura 122 is spot on with your smaller 6.7-9.2 m2 sails.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Ultrasonic||rikys2||Ask Our Team||0||10th April 2011 09:45 PM|
|Ultrasonic||rikys2||Ask Our Team||0||8th April 2011 10:02 PM|
|ultrasonic 147||jfc||Ask Our Team||1||14th February 2011 08:26 AM|
|ultrasonic||jfc||French Forum||0||12th February 2011 05:32 PM|
|Fin for ultrasonic and 8.0 ncx||MOP||Ask Our Team||8||14th December 2010 02:29 PM|