Go Back   Starboard Forums > Ask Our Team

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9th March 2012, 12:40 AM   #91
Brett Morris
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 32
Default

167W is a step up in performance. A bit more technical but definitely faster around the course.
It is that simple!
Brett Morris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2012, 01:17 AM   #92
SeanAUS120
Dream Team Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia // Dokkum, Netherlands
Posts: 149
Send a message via Skype™ to SeanAUS120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raffig View Post
Hi,
a few riders over here have found it really "sticky" in order to get it into planning mode, particularly in marginal conditions (8-9 knots).
I think this is to do with the deeper cutouts; they seem to create a bit of a 'suck' under the board. That being said, I haven't had too much trouble with getting planing in very light winds, and I'm not using a 12m anymore ... It is definitely slower in the gybes with this extra width I believe and I think you have to always pump it from outside the straps when you try to plane (ie, not putting your front foot in the front strap, as this seems to dig the windward rail quite a bit on such a big board).

The key is with this board is that the tail is so powerful it generates a LOT of lift from the fin. So you don't need a big fin at all, in fact, you want just a really FAST fin.... I've been using a 70cm in all wind conditions very successfully and will probably go with that all season (how nice is one fin only!). I see a few guys on the Z's are using 71cut in all conditions and on the VMG like I am using a lot are going for 70 or up to a 73 ... so there's no need to use anything bigger than a few cm cutdown .. it's just drag and actually makes the board very hard to control downwind when the wind gets up....
__________________
GetWindsurfFit.com // The Ultimate Windsurfing Fitness Program.
SeanAUS120 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2012, 07:12 PM   #93
berg
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 41
Default

Sean, or someone else

I have the virus 72 and the HWR, what is the next step to get better upwind. I am no match at a PD with the same size fin(kashi). Is it the kashi or can I tune something els to get better upwind. The virus rake is 90 degrees on the back of the fin.

Hope to hear something
Thanks in advance
Berg
berg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2012, 08:15 PM   #94
NED136
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18
Default

@ Sean /Raffig: I also have no sticky feeling at all with this board (5 months of sailing now). In my opinion it planes very quickly, even with my weight of 97kg. I use the virus 70cm and NP evo 12m in 8 - 9 knots. I never pump on to the plane in the straps, never did before on other boards in marginal conditions.

Maybe the sticky feeling on your board (Raffig) is related with you sail set up / the downforce of the sail pressing the board to much down?

@ Brett: I don't agree the board is more technical. I think the board is a lot less technical when going up and down wind.

Last edited by NED136; 19th March 2012 at 08:18 PM.
NED136 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2012, 09:59 AM   #95
OZI
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 48
Default

I must admit I did feel the board was a little sucky/sticky and a little hard to pump onto the plane when I first got it. I then changed to a new ZF1 S- This fin is awesome on this board and I have had no problems since. Also I think the 167W takes a little bit of getting used to pumping the board up onto the plane in light winds.
OZI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2012, 03:53 PM   #96
berg
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 41
Default rake

after a few months of formula I like to know if there is experience withe the rake of the fin. Should it be 0 degrees( at the back of the fin)? like to hear

greetz from Holland
berg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IS 117 wide vs IS 121 mn.le.clercq French Forum 2 15th August 2011 05:58 PM
Isonic 107 vs 117 vs 117 wide Hugues French Forum 19 5th June 2011 04:43 PM
isonic 117 wide ore 137 andre 1966 Ask Our Team 2 28th April 2011 01:07 PM
iSonic 117 Wide vs 127/131 NIG Ask Our Team 8 31st January 2011 07:16 PM
Select R03 DC Wide 70 Medium for Formula 161 michelb Free Forum 0 14th April 2009 10:42 PM


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 10:49 PM.