|13th March 2012, 10:46 PM||#1|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Futura 144 or 2010 Go 133?
I found that 2009 and 2010 Futura 133 and "Starboard Go 133" models share the same size, the only difference is that "Go" boards coated with tufskin which makes them 2kg heavier. Is 2kg extra board weight going to play big difference on the flat water 10mph - 18mph, my weight 216 pounds, my skill level is intermediate currently and when I progress?
Regarding the board my options are to go with Futura 144 or with 2009/2010 "Starboard Go 133". Flat water progressing to choppy waters, 10mph - 18mph wind, my weight is 216 pounds, skill level intermediate. I am planning to use 7.5 Ezzy Freeride sail with it. My current skills are not perfect but I am able to waterstart and uphaul Futura 133. What is the better choice in this case?
|14th March 2012, 09:56 AM||#2|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montréal (PQ) CANADA
as i am also a heavyweight @ 100 kilos/220 pounds, and sail in lighter winds - like 10 to 15 mph, i suggest a bigger floatier board like a 145 or even a 160 liter board. Now i use a racier longboard in 10 knots and love it more than the 160 liter board - goes better through the lulls when using a cambered freerace sail. People tell me the Futura is much better board in terms of performance than the GO - in the end, you choose
joe windsurfer @ 105 kg
2012 JP SLW92, 2012 SB iS 117W, 2000 Fanatic BEE 124 LTD + Mistral Equipe II XR
HSM Fire 6.3, NS Duke 6.9, TR-6 8.4, HSM SPF 8.5,TR4 10.0
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Futura 141 2010||Fredo||French Forum||6||4th October 2011 12:00 AM|
|Futura 93 2011 vs Futura 93 2010/2009||MarcoM||Ask Our Team||2||12th December 2010 12:50 PM|
|Futura 93 2009 vs Futura 93 2010||van||Ask Our Team||6||5th May 2010 07:50 PM|
|2010 Futura in WC?||agrelon||Free Forum||1||11th March 2010 02:52 PM|
|Futura 101, 2010.||Unregistered||Free Forum||0||8th January 2010 04:16 PM|