Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18th August 2006, 12:24 AM   #1
hans kleingeld
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 65
Send a message via MSN to hans kleingeld
Default Which iSonic (94 or 101)

Hi,

I tested a lot of slalomboards during the season. Also the sonic 85 and isonic105. The 85 really convinced my with 6.0 GTX and high wind conditions (20-30 Kts with gusts over 35 Kts) with the board staying controllable and very solid. The iSonic105 I tested with too small fins most of the time (32 cm) which didn't give a very proper view to me.

Which iSonic may be better for me (95 kg) in flat to choppy conditions for the Overdrive 6.5 for slalom and speedsailing? The bigger sail is an OD 7.5 and the smaller an OD 5.5 which work great!! The 7.5 will be used with my Falcon120 normally. The 5.5 I may use also on this board, but the 50 may look nice for the 5.5 and RS4 5.0!

nb
: the site is working better and better at the moment, but I can get any details at this time. Does the 87 and 94 have slide cut outs as well?

nb: does the 50 also has any slalomaspects or you always have to walk back (with I normally do at Strand Horst in the Netherlands (also with large boards) after making a dozen of speedruns to much). How does it deal with small/larger chop (0.5 mtr<), what are the differences with the small isonics. Which sailsizes can the 50 handle easely?

Thanks in advance!
hans kleingeld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2006, 07:07 AM   #2
Ian Fox
STARBOARD
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 532
Default RE: Which iSonic (94 or 101)

Hi Hans,

Welcome to the new site


"I tested a lot of slalomboards during the season. Also the sonic 85 and isonic105. The 85 really convinced my with 6.0 GTX and high wind conditions (20-30 Kts with gusts over 35 Kts) with the board staying controllable and very solid. The iSonic105 I tested with too small fins most of the time (32 cm) which didn&#39;t give a very proper view to me."

It&#39;s pretty fair to say the iS105 has been rather convincing in top level competitions to date, and a lot of times 32cm would have been the fin, so it really comes down to testing (or racing) the board tuned in optimal for the conditions you&#39;re using/testing it in. I guess the point made here is that (in the correct conditions) 32cm is a very good size for top end iS105 performance.

"Which iSonic may be better for me (95 kg) in flat to choppy conditions for the Overdrive 6.5 for slalom and speedsailing? The bigger sail is an OD 7.5 and the smaller an OD 5.5 which work great!! The 7.5 will be used with my Falcon120 normally. The 5.5 I may use also on this board, but the 50 may look nice for the 5.5 and RS4 5.0!"

If you want to new board to cover the 7.5m also, then the iS94 would be a good allround choice, more especially if you have a special smaller rocket for pure speed. If you decide to abandon the idea to use a 7.5m on this (new) slalom board, but maybe at the same time have the (new) slalom board also cover you for speed in medium (less than true epic) speed conditions as well, then the iS87 will be a very practical compromise and would certainly be Ok still with OD 5.5m
(by RS4 5.0 /95kg conditions, well, you can imagine, even the 87 is getting a bit more than required..).


nb: the site is working better and better at the moment, but I can get any details at this time.

Thanks, we are working on that bug, there is also a thread (iSonic- Widths) in AskTeam with iS details for short term.

"Does the 87 and 94 have slide cut outs as well?"
No, we tested but decided to not use these at this time in these models.

"nb: does the 50 also has any slalomaspects or you always have to walk back (with I normally do at Strand Horst in the Netherlands (also with large boards) after making a dozen of speedruns to much)."

Ok, well it depends a bit on the driver, but the boys in The PiT will tell you that I&#39;m not walking a lot, at least not while they are sailing by comparison. For 95kg, the iS50 has limited "slalom" potential but is definitely designed to be a very practical board out on the speed course, and to allow the rider to quickly, easily, efficently (not using excess energy walking or sailing) get back to the top and complete as many runs as possible in a session. Benefits of that are rather obvious
( a side note here for others is that for heavier riders especially, the iS50 does need some pretty good technique, moderate windy conditions and maybe some positive attitude to get the thing going, - it&#39;s NOT a F161 - but it WILL do it and when it does it&#39;s pretty sweet.
With a 95kg rider and 5.5m-6m sail , the iS50 will plane reasonably slow, as slow as 15 (even around 12) kts of BOARDSPEED (note! Board speed not windspeed) - which might seem and odd or unimpressive stat to most of you, but once you&#39;re on a true speed board trying to sail back upwind (and potentially thru chop) it&#39;s a very useful thing on a board with killer top end potential as well)


"How does it deal with small/larger chop (0.5 mtr<, what are the differences with the small isonics."

iS50 is designed for top speed in medium to perfect conditions (not just perfect), which in most good speed locations means rolling chop on broad course to (aprox) 30 cm in the speed run and more out the back sailing back up. At top speed it handles the speed course chop very well, on the sail back (in rougher chop ) the iS50 is very practical and "seaworthy" for asedicated speedboard, but it should NOT be viewed that the iS50 is killer fast thru open ocean chop or extreme confused chop (as often would be found in conditions where a 95kg rider is using a 50lt board ..) BTW, it IS killer fast in these conditions, emphasis on killer.

"Which sailsizes can the 50 handle easely?"
Basically the true speed range 4.0m - 6.0-6.+ m (pure race sail sizes) for adult top level speed use.
For 85-95kg rider, the sweetspot will be 5,5m (5x-6.0m currently I&#39;m using CodeRed 6.1m very effectively, with on water weight 100kg), but my ideal size is probably 5.1m/5.6m.
An interesting aspect is that with a very well tuned sail (around 5.6m, for my size) this board will provide enormous practical (speed) range over a range of conditions with virtually the same setup.

Hope this helps answer these questions but welcome further discussion/s.

Cheers ~ Ian
Ian Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2006, 07:58 AM   #3
hans kleingeld
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 65
Send a message via MSN to hans kleingeld
Default RE: Which iSonic (94 or 101)

Thanks a lot for your comments Ian!

From your marks some things become quit clear to me. For realistic reasons a 2 board solution will work much better for me.

1. The 5.5 and 6.5 overdrive sizes are in the sweetspot of the iS87 and compromises the 5.0 RS4

1. The 6.5 OD is in the sweetspot of the iS94, 7.5 at the edge of the sweetspot, 5.5 and 5.5 are (too) small with the iS94

If remarks stated above are true the iS87 will be the better option for me for the OD 5.5 en RS5.0 (maybe on the edge). I didn&#39;t try it&#39;s precedessor with a 6.5, but the 6.0 GTX worked very nice.

It appears to me that not very much has changed when you compare the sonic85 with the iSonic87, but this may be misleading while I don&#39;t know anything about the details. Which improvements may I expect on the water to feel and see (GPS) compared to the sonic85. I can imagne the differences might be small, but it is nice to know how 1 year development may work out!

When I take a rough guess the best board option with an OD 7.5 is the iSonic101?

OK, thanks in advance. Time to go to bed now after a heavy thundershower woke me up in the middle of the night and made me put on the PC.
hans kleingeld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2006, 09:08 AM   #4
Ian Fox
STARBOARD
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 532
Default RE: Which iSonic (94 or 101)

Hi Again Hans,

To further reply your comments :

1. The 5.5 and 6.5 overdrive sizes are in the sweetspot of the iS87 and compromises the 5.0 RS4

Correct, especially for 95kg speed/slalom.

1. The 6.5 OD is in the sweetspot of the iS94, 7.5 at the edge of the sweetspot, 5.5 and 5.5 are (too) small with the iS94

Correct, especially for 95kg speed/slalom.

If remarks stated above are true the iS87 will be the better option for me for the OD 5.5 en RS5.0 (maybe on the edge).

Correct.

I didn&#39;t try it&#39;s precedessor with a 6.5, but the 6.0 GTX worked very nice.

It appears to me that not very much has changed when you compare the sonic85 with the iSonic87, but this may be misleading while I don&#39;t know anything about the details. Which improvements may I expect on the water to feel and see (GPS) compared to the sonic85. I can imagne the differences might be small, but it is nice to know how 1 year development may work out!

Well both versions basically share a similar rocker and have theoretical similar top speed, however what we developed into iS87 /94 is the general iS trait of more control and easier riding at the top end/limit, in both flat water and extreme chop, which improved in iS87/94. Marginally, not quantum, but enough to notice with reasonable experience. Nett result is a a board that is more fast more often (or more correctly, able to be sailed closer to theoretical max a higher % of time, which in real world makes a board faster in most situations, even if the design/theory vMax doesn&#39;t change)

When I take a rough guess the best board option with an OD 7.5 is the iSonic101?

Correct for you in this case (c/w iS87/94 options) if you also want good 7.5 range for general slalom racing and/or "blasting" as well as doubling as a light wind speed conditions board.
(iS101 is a really verstatile size, alot of bottom end but still plenty of control and range when really overcooked at the top end- esp with bigger riders)

For others please note : The typical (theoretical) allround use sweetspot for a 95kg rider with 7.5m is actually more like iS111 than even iS101, however in Han&#39;s case I know he really wants a board choice with heavy emphasis on speed rather than slalom; (and he can use even iS94 with 7.5m in that mode). In true slalom racing, reacceleration back to top speed around marks etc and maintaining a high average speed (compared to theoretical vMax only) are key factors in selecting the optimum board and in most cases would indicate a board one size (or more) larger than for the same size rider/sail in "speed" mode. Same applies to recreational and general slalaom board sizing/use ; a more moderate approach to small meaning fast yields practical allround benefits for a general user ; a true speed maniac is prepared to compromise more heavily than the average user. And maybe walk (or swim !!) more often

Cheers ~ Ian
Ian Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2006, 01:46 PM   #5
hans kleingeld
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 65
Send a message via MSN to hans kleingeld
Default RE: Which iSonic (94 or 101)

Thanks a lot for your extended answer Ian,

It&#39;s right that due to my emphases towards speed, but may be more important the very good speeding conditions at my home spot (Beach Horst in the Netherlands) I don&#39;t worry about windlulls and deep water. When the wind is too little and the board can&#39;t float we simple look around for gusts and stay in knee deep water. This makes speedsurfing very relaxing at times. We don&#39;t have to care to be forced to swimming in deep water when wind has gone (unless you go far out in2 mtr deep water which can happen sometimes after an enthousiastic speedrun)!.
hans kleingeld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th August 2006, 05:53 PM   #6
SimonH
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3
Default RE: Which iSonic (94 or 101)

Ian.

What isonic proto were you using when you when you cracked a 42 knot average on the gps-speedsurfing site.

Which isonic would marry well with the sonic 100 as a high wind change down?

Thanks

Simon
SimonH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th August 2006, 07:18 AM   #7
Ian Fox
STARBOARD
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 532
Default RE: Which iSonic (94 or 101)

Q1="What isonic proto were you using when you when you cracked a 42 knot average on the gps-speedsurfing site".

A1= The session of Feb 23, 2006 (iSonic X - as it was unnamed at that time) was the 46.5 proto, that exact proto was UPS&#39;d to BKK, cosmetically repaired and then used to master iS50 2007).
BTW, the fin in that session also is the proto for the Drake Speed 230.



Q2 ="Which isonic would marry well with the sonic 100 as a high wind change down?"

A2= Really depends on the intended usage for the hi wind changedown. If it&#39;s open water slalom racing or hi wind blasting in anything other than very flat water (rare, unless you&#39;re on a speedstrip), the iS87 is the "S100 changedown" choice for sure.
There is definite performance merit in not going too small for hi wind/extreme wind open water board size if you need to deal with significant/confused/harsh chop at speed.
If you wanted to go from S100 slalom race/slalom blast to (more) true pure speed conditions (and ride style), iS50 is possible but there is minimal practical overlap. (how much depends on the rider&#39;s ability to get the iS50 going early - or not- and that can also be influenced by "quality" of conditions and/or location as well as rider variables weight/skill/experience/attitude/etc.

Hope that all makes sense ?

Let us know if you&#39;d like more info/detail etc.

Cheers ~ Ian
Ian Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006, 10:49 AM   #8
Philip
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 159
Default RE: Which iSonic (94 or 101)

Interesting discussion. How about the same sail sizing and wind conditions for a 70kg sailor? Would the 101 still be the best all round board for the average sailor or would the next smaller sized board be the viable choice.
Philip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006, 06:12 PM   #9
Ian Fox
STARBOARD
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 532
Default RE: Which iSonic (94 or 101)

Hi Philip,

Sorry, quite a few sail sizes/wind conditions mixed in this discussion.

In general, yes the iS101 is a good allround choice for a lighter rider, however that choice would move the sweetspot for that board(sail) combo down the wind range c/w a 95kg rider on the same setup.
(Setting sail size aside - when it&#39;s ideal for 95kg on iS101, the 70kg guy is most likely better on iS94 and so on.).

If you clarify your sail range, wind+water conditions/ intended ride style (slalom race/blasting/speed) etc for this board a bit more, we&#39;ll be able to provide a more accurate recommendation.

Thanks and Cheers ~ Ian
Ian Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd August 2006, 05:28 AM   #10
ed sinofsky
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1
Default RE: Which iSonic (94 or 101)

Hi Ian

Could you tell us more about the &#39;drake" 230. Is this a version of one of Boogie&#39;s C3 designs? I love those fins, and now that he has moved, I think someone should produce these masterpieces. Will they be available separately? The control and slippery feel of the X1 is unreal........

thanks: I am one of your admirers, both of your speed and spirit.

ed sinofsky
ed sinofsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 03:45 AM.