Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14th March 2007, 07:38 PM   #1
178
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 3
Default Formula 161 for light weight sailors (response for Menzzo)

This is a answear to Menzzo who wrote this on the forum:
Posted on 12-03-2007 13:06 Quote
Be careful to follow that last bit of advice! The New StarBoard F161 was designed following the specifications and requests of Antoine Albeau - Its a board that works perfectly for him. Now Albeau for want of a more flattering description is what they call a big bugger. Tall, big built, and heavier than your average.

What people have found is that the F161 is much harder to pin down in slightly heavier winds than the F160. Albeau is able to do this because of sheer size and weight but if you do not match that physicality you will struggle to keep the board on the water when the wind comes up. If you are 90+ kilos and over 6 foot, I am sure its faster than anything out there.


Like Rene Vila said, the SB 161 works well for any sailors weight.
I am a light weight sailor (73kg and 1.78m) and was impressed with the SB 161 in all kinds of wind. At the midwinters, the first day, we had winds gusting up to 30 knots, and the 161 was incredible easy to sail, I had no problem with the board flying. I usually use a smaller fin on those winds, but since I only had a 70, I used it and it felt great. I had been 3 months with out sailing formula and that did not matter with the 161, as it was so easy to sail. On the strongest wind race, I was on 9.8 and finished 3rd behind mika and antoene. If you look at the results, in the mid winters, 1,2,3,5,6 all SB with different sailors weight, 1st antoene heavy, I think close to 100kg, 2nd Jesper around 82 kg, 3rd Mika 90 kg, 5th Wilhelm 73kg, 6th Fabio 88kg. So you can see that you have all wight range. I agree that the heavy sailors have a advantage in strong winds, but with the 161, I believe the difference is much less than the 160 or any other board. I really found the 161 easy to hold on strong winds.
Best regards,
Wilhelm Schurmann
BRA 999
178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2007, 04:50 PM   #2
Mezza30
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 34
Default RE: Formula 161 for light weight sailors (response for Menzzo)

I will have to bow to those with actual experience - but I know in the UK there are a number of lightweight sailors who already got rid of the F161 to go back to the F160 for reasons I mentioned
Mezza30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2007, 05:43 PM   #3
pfaffi
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Austria - Lake Neusiedler, closed Vienna
Posts: 136
Send a message via Skype™ to pfaffi
Default RE: Formula 161 for light weight sailors (response for Menzzo)

Hi Guys! My friends and me are using the F161. We are from 72kg/168cm up to 93/184cm (me). The F161 is easy to surf in all wind conditions but sensible what fin you are using like always in Formula, nothing new! If your fins are too much forward raked and maybe soft you will get in troubles when th boardnose lifts up. The same is on the sail trim. Take a harmless fin in stronger wind and find the correct trim of your sail (more downhall is not always adviseable).
Have joy in 30kn downwind! peter.
pfaffi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2007, 07:16 PM   #4
o2bnme
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maine & North Carolina
Posts: 230
Send a message via AIM to o2bnme Send a message via Yahoo to o2bnme
Default RE: Formula 161 for light weight sailors (response for Menzzo)

Quote:
Mezza30 wrote:
I will have to bow to those with actual experience - but I know in the UK there are a number of lightweight sailors who already got rid of the F161 to go back to the F160 for reasons I mentioned
How heavy are the people you are referring to?
__________________
Starboard [Gemini, F-Type 148, iSonic 105], AHD [Convert 60, GT Special 73], Windsurfer
Neil Pryde [v8 9.8], Sailworks [Retro 8.0; Hucker 6.6, 5.6, 4.8]


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
o2bnme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2007, 03:55 PM   #5
raffig
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 50
Default RE: Formula 161 for light weight sailors (response for Menzzo)

Hello all,

So, according to what you said, would it be Ok to use a R13 medium rake + 8cm for stronger winds (Remi Vila's suggestion)?

I am 74 Kg and I use a 161. I already have a R19 soft-- 8 cm and I would like to get a fin for +15 knots. I also have a Dynafoil 68 cm M-, but I have not had a chance to use it yet.

Thanks for your suggestions.

Rafa
raffig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2007, 06:59 PM   #6
mantas
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1
Default RE: Formula 161 for light weight sailors (response for Menzzo)

Hi Wilhelm,


What 70 cm fin exactly you have used in Midwinter when wind was up to 30 knots? As i remember from your previous posts in the past you liked r13 68 cm fin in strong winds.
And one more question:whats your favorite fin with 161 in light wind?



Best regards,

Mantas
mantas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2007, 07:52 AM   #7
178
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 3
Default RE: Formula 161 for light weight sailors (response for Menzzo)

Hi Mantas,
In the mid winters I used a R13 S-- for light winds and a R13 S. for strong winds. I broke my R13 68 in the end of last year and so far haven't got another one.
The two fins I mentioned are the only ones I tried and they felt realy good.
When I get a chance to test some different fins I will let you know.
Best regards,
Wilhelm
178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2007, 06:56 PM   #8
christophe
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19
Default RE: Formula 161 for light weight sailors (response for Menzzo)

Hi
I have tested the F161 with a R19 and I feel this fin give too much power for my 75kg
For me I think the R13 is the good compromise

Wilhelm, what is the rake for your R13 S-- ? +6 or +8

christophe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 06:17 AM   #9
178
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 3
Default RE: Formula 161 for light weight sailors (response for Menzzo)

+6
178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 12:59 AM   #10
Priesty
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1
Default RE: Formula 161 for light weight sailors (response for Menzzo)

I have just upgraded from the 158 to 161 and my impressions are as follows (i weight 78kgs and i'm 6"1):

Initially i found the 161 much more difficult to control than the 158 (with 70cm r13s+8). This was using similar mast track settings to the 158 (ie quite far back)

However, having moved the mast track all the way forward it is much easier to control. I was out on my 9.8 in 20-25 knots with the stock 70fin (70cm r19s+8) and it felt very good. I was surprised that with the mast track so far forward it didn't feel sluggish in the lulls. It felt fast and pointed high.

Does anyone know what settings people are using for mast track?
Priesty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 05:24 AM.