iSonic 133.. Why 2?

Phill104 · 18th August 2007, 03:19 AM

I was just wondering why there are 2 different iSonic 133 models. Is it something to do with slalom 42 regulations?

Ian Fox · 18th August 2007, 07:20 AM

Actually the iS133w80 was (is ?) an early release 2008 version.

Since then, ongoing development of the iS133w85 has proven to exceed the iS133w80 in basically all respects, the w80 will be withdrawn.

Commercially this is not really an issue as orders for w80 are now bloacker (referred to w85)

For clarity purpose, w80 should be removed from this list.

Cheers ~ Ian

Chris Pressler · 28th August 2007, 05:57 AM

Yeah Phil, PWA Slalom 42 could go for 85 as the max. limit in 2008. IFCA already has the 85 rule.

Chris

www.chrispressler.com

18th August 2007, 03:19 AM	#1
Phill104 Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 295	iSonic 133.. Why 2? I was just wondering why there are 2 different iSonic 133 models. Is it something to do with slalom 42 regulations?

18th August 2007, 07:20 AM	#2
Ian Fox STARBOARD Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 532	Well spotted, Phill. Actually the iS133w80 was (is ?) an early release 2008 version. Since then, ongoing development of the iS133w85 has proven to exceed the iS133w80 in basically all respects, the w80 will be withdrawn. Commercially this is not really an issue as orders for w80 are now bloacker (referred to w85) For clarity purpose, w80 should be removed from this list. Cheers ~ Ian

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

28th August 2007, 05:57 AM	#3
Chris Pressler Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: AUSTRIA, Lake Neusiedler Posts: 297	Yeah Phil, PWA Slalom 42 could go for 85 as the max. limit in 2008. IFCA already has the 85 rule. Chris www.chrispressler.com