Go Back   Starboard Forums > Ask Our Team

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4th September 2006, 11:29 PM   #1
dbaruch
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3
Default Mast track position vs sail size

I am the proud new owner of a starbord S Type 115, coming from a bigger board (F2 Xantos 295 - 127 ltr).

I am an intermediate sailor, and after 8 times on the water in conditions from 16 to 25 knots in flat water, using sails 7.4, 6.2 and 5.0 I have not yet found the sweet spot, and I am fighting alot with my gear, getting catapulted, etc. :@ and I am not being able to get the board to plane as quickly as I did on the previous one.

I am sure it's a rigging problem, but cannot figure out what, although I suspect the position of the universal on the mast track. The expert sailor at the store where I bought it isnists that for any sail size, to ALLWAYS position the universal at the middle of the track. I however, have gotten used to the markings on the Xantos' mast track where for bigger sails I placed the mast base forward, and for smaller sails backward (for the 7.4 sail all the way forward, the 6.2 just forward of the middle position, and for the 5.0 slightly forward of the rear position).

Who is right? What are the nautical physics principles here?

Thanks!

Dado
dbaruch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2006, 12:08 AM   #2
Roger
Dream Team - School Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,110
Default RE: Mast track position vs sail size

Hi Dado,
Did you mean to post this twice?
If not, we can remove the first post.
OK, on to your problems with getting the S-Type 115 planing easily.
First, it's a bit narrower than you Xantos 295 (overall) but a bigger "issue" here is the difference in rockerline.
You are going to have to move much further back on the S-Type 115 to get the nose up so it can plane.
If you still have the Xantos, take a straight edge and place it on the bottom (or stretch a string tightly down the center of the board to make a straight line).
Notice that the planing surfaces (basically flat in the fore and aft direction) on your Xantos extend well forward of the mast track.
Now do the same test on your new S-Type 115.
Notice that the flat surfaces only extend forward from the tail of the board to somewhere under the front footstraps, and then the board starts to rapidly "curve away from straight.
So here's the physics of this issue.
You are accustomed to sailing a board with a long planing flat, so you can stand up near the mast foot (I used to have a Xantos 295 so I know about this) sheet in some, and work your way onto a plane BEFORE you start to move back on your board.
When you try this on the S-Type, it does not work as long as you keep your weight forward of the front footstraps.
Why?
Because there's an area I call the "rocker transition" where the shape (rockerline) in the bottom of your board "transitions" from flat at the back to an increasing curvature in front of the front footstraps.
So, as long as you keep your weight forward, the "rocker transition" stays down, the nose of your board stays down, and your plaing flat (from the front footstraps to the tail of the board) remain "inclined" down at the front.
You are pushing alot of water with the rocker transition, and there is no lift (from an inclined UP at the front) from your planing surface.
So, your board remains "stuck like glue as there's no lift to get the board over its bow wave (now stuck just in front of the rocker transition)
So, to remedy this, you need to start moving back on your board sooner (NOT faster, esp. on the S-Types) to get the nose up and change the pitch (fore and aft) trim of your planing surface from negative (down at the front) to positive (UP at the front).
This will "unstick" your board, help prevent a lot of catapaulting (due to the board not wanting to plane off easily), and get you up to speed very quickly.
As far as where to place the mast foot, the "knowledgable guy" at the shop is not giving you very good advice.
Your own instinctive " more forward for larger sails", "further back for smaller sails" is pretty good, but you need to experiment with this.
There's usually a "sweet spot" on most boards, but that does not mean that you will always put the mast base right at that point.
For each sail size, start with the mast foot at the back of the track, and go out and sail your board.
If the board is "tailwalking" and pretty much impossible to control, them move the mast foot forward a cm or 2 (3/8-3/4") at a time until you just have marginal control.
This will normally be the fastest mast foot postion for that sail size, with your rig, your stance, your boom height, and the fin you are using.
If you find the board spins out alot, move the mast foot forward a little more. Moving the pressure from the mast foot further away from the resistance of the fin can help sometimes with spin out, but it settles and slows your board.
I have quite a bit of time on the S-Type 115 and I found it to be my board of choice for 7.5-5.5 m2 in slightly rougher conditions. If the water was pretty flat I'd use the Isonic 115. If it was a little choppy and I wanted to chop hop a little the S-Type was better.
Again, moving your mast foot too far forward can cause a very rough ride.
You need to find the pitch trim, which mast foot positioning dees effect where your board is fast and free. Too far back and the nose rides too high and you may experience "tailwalking".
Too far forward, and you will "glue" your board to the water with insufficient pitch trim and the board will slam into every piece of chop and then rebound.
So you need to find the "blend" of too high (out of control) and too low
(limiited control due to slamming and rebounding with too much pitch oscillation).
Again, I think the best solution to your issues is to move your weight back on the board, progressively, as your speed increases, striving to keep the board accelerating.
Hope this helps,
Roger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2006, 04:10 PM   #3
dbaruch
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3
Default RE: Mast track position vs sail size

Roger,

Thanks for the explanation. I learned alot from your writing, and I found especialy usefull your explanation of board hull design and use. I look forward to try your fine tunning advice on the water real soon B).

I will let you know of the results!
dbaruch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2006, 06:16 PM   #4
dbaruch
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3
Default RE: Strap position vs mastbase position

Roger,

Iv'e been playing with the location of the mastbase and I am getting to get a better feeling for the rocker effect.

The "expert" at the store installed the front straps in the frontmost-innermost option of the board, and I am not getting balanced there.

What is the best placement for the straps? What do I need to look for?

Dado
dbaruch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2006, 08:35 PM   #5
Roger
Dream Team - School Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,110
Default RE: Mast track position vs sail size

Hi again Dado,
Glad to hear you are getting a little better feel for your S-Type.
I found with the S-Type 115 I had last year that the inboard footstrap positions worked "OK" for choppy bump and jump conditions when I wanted the board to handle the chop so I could jump it (chop hop really) it and get more secure landings with the footstraps inboard.
But for the best speed, I used the outboard footstrap positons and put the straps on with the back screw in the back hole and the front screw in the middle hole.
This allows me to turn and twist my foot a little under the strap so I can change the balance points slightly to match the conditions.
Twisting the heel a little forward or a little back gives you a little "weight shift" that can provide that extra little bit of control you need as the condtions change out on the water.
I finally settled on outboard footstraps, in the above configuration and eventually got so I could chop hop just as well with this setup as with the FS inboard.
Try moving your footstraps outboard, and then try them in different holes to see what feels the best for your height and weight with your rigs.
Once you get the board set up for your size ans style it will be quite a bit faster than your Xantos. Might not plane a whole lot earlier, but if you bear off and use a little wave to get going, the S-Type gets going pretty early for a board that's this narrow.
Due to the narrower width, it's really a better board for powered up conditions. If the conditions were at all "marginal", I would use the F-Type 148 or Isonic 115 as both planed earlier than the S-Type.
Hope this helps,
Roger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 03:46 PM.