Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20th October 2006, 06:46 PM   #21
Ian Fox
STARBOARD
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 532
Default RE: iSonic 87, 94 or 101

Hi Mark,

It's a good question, and one I was just thinking about the other day (having had a great iS101 session) - for ride, the iS101 has much more of the S100's versatile speed / range/ "do anything" potential; for "feel", well this is an interesting one as the feel of the iS101 is a little different to the S100- but in the same way the feel of the S100 was very good (and very popular) , the iS101 actually has (to my mind) an even better feel - but noting that the classic slalom board feel of the S100 is maybe slightly closer in iS94.

If you loved the S100, have an S125 and S90, are tall and heavy and want something 7.6/6.4 and occasional 5.8, iS101 for sure.

Might have to see if we can put together another iS megathread, then we can include some more board info as .g.e.o. suggested to add more description to the style/ride/handlling of each version.

Cheers ~ Ian
Ian Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2006, 07:03 PM   #22
mark h
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW England,
Posts: 710
Default RE: iSonic 87, 94 or 101

Thanks Ian, looks like a iS101 is on the xmas list.

Cheers
__________________
Cheers - Mark H

The toys:
iSW44 - - iSW49 - iSW53 - iSW58 - iS107 - iS137 - F161.
North Warps: F2012 5.2m, 5.7m, 6.3m, 7m, 8m, 8.6m, 9.5m F2006 11m.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
mark h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st October 2006, 02:31 PM   #23
geo
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 327
Default RE: iSonic 87, 94 or 101

I edited my previous post in order to make it more clear.

Corrected "what a board is best at" with "in which conditions a board is at its best", which is conceptually different and more precisely separated from the other information "in which conditions a board is first choice".

Sorry, my English gets faulty when I am in a hurry.
geo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st October 2006, 06:14 PM   #24
Ian Fox
STARBOARD
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 532
Default RE: iSonic 87, 94 or 101

Hi .g.e.o.

Thanks, understood. We'll get the website update done and out of the way and get onto the additional board information updates.

Cheers ~ Ian
Ian Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 07:41 PM.