|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Question for Ian or SB team,
Can u give us some insight on the double wingers for 09 isonics, as in what purpose it serves? It looks like the tail section after the double wingers is narrower. Thanks. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
www.nationalwatersportsfestival.com
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Hayling Island Hampshire England
Posts: 83
|
My undetsanding is that the said max width of the board is mainly to creat lift to get the board initially plaining. The wingers at the back ensure's the board has less width ie contact with the water so greater speed potential and with the possibility of slightly eaier gybing.
Rgds Al,
__________________
Allan Cross National Watersports Festival (NWF) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. GBR68 The toys! Starboard 2013 Kode Wave 87 (C), 2009 Futura 93 (W), 2013 Kode 103 (W), 2013 ISonic 107 & 127 (C) Severne 2013 Blade 4.2, 4.7 and 5.3, 2013 Gator 5.7, 2012 NCX 6.5, 2013 Overdrive R4 6.2, 7.0, 7.8 and 8.6. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 327
|
Double wingers are just a way to have a specific width distribution over the board's length. Can do that with double wingers, like Aquata was doing in the '80s, or with a nicely tapered outline. Double wingers have one specific advantage over a smooth looking outline: they look weird and technologic. Great for marketing.
The real news seems to be that the iSonics needed some width reduction in specific areas. Just my view, of course. Ready to change it if someone provides good explanations. Current explanation in the iSonic page ("The theory behind the concept: ...") just says that boards work better when they are wider in the middle and narrower in the tail... Last edited by geo; 12th September 2008 at 09:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Guys,
Thanks for the reply. Btw, what is the optimum sail and fin size for the Isonic 101 , for a 75kg guy ? |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AUSTRIA, Lake Neusiedler
Posts: 297
|
Hi,
sailsizes from 6,5 to 7,5 and fins in between 36 and 38 cm. Chris
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 22
|
What about the Isonic 111?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AUSTRIA, Lake Neusiedler
Posts: 297
|
Hi Philsurf,
I did not sail the 111 so much, but guess that the board works greta with sail from 7,0 to 8,5. I also sailed a 9,0 on while testing an it worked quite good. Antoine i susing the board with 7,8 a lot I think. Concerning the finlength: it always depends which product you use, how powerful the fin is. I would suggest 40 -42 (44 with 9,0). Perhaps someone else can come up with further notes. All the best Phil, Chris
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Posts: 572
|
iSonic 111 2008 with 6.3m2 38cm fin. 6.6m2 with 40cm fin. 7.6m2 with 42cm fin and 8.4cm 44 cm fin. I have not sail this board with the 9.2m2 I have but I will use probably the 44cm fin.
All sails are MauiSails TR-3 and TR-4 and Vector Fins Canefire. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AUSTRIA, Lake Neusiedler
Posts: 297
|
Nonopro,
thanks. That sounds excellent. The canfires from Vector work great on the Isonics. Chris
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Chris,
will be receiving my IS101 very soon, i'm planning to use it for 6.3 and 7.3 ... for the 6.3, would 32 cm fin be too small? for 7.3 , i'm using 36cm C3 cheers |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|