Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7th June 2009, 01:28 AM   #91
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Guitars .... Nothing to do with it !

Aircraft........ Some connection ??

Hydrofoils ...?? Isnt that another word for our fin/skeg ??? A water foil ???? A fin is simply a Hydrofoil rotated 90 degrees ????

You might be going in circles ???
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 01:29 AM   #92
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

farlo you are correct, circles.

The only definitive thing to come form this is that there is no definitive answer to the original question.

In my experience as someone who has a polished fin that does not spin out(a c3) and also lots of sanded fins, some that spin out, others that dont, it doesnt seem to make an awful lot of difference if you polish or sand and this would tally with theory that says after a certain level of smoothness any smoother doesnt really do anything extra( its inside the boundary layer)

Of far more importance seems to be the quality of the section.

so unless something new comes to the party im outa here to.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 05:30 PM   #93
Erik Loots
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Netherlands, Alkmaar
Posts: 109
Send a message via MSN to Erik Loots
Default

It would be very intresting to see if Anyone goes a X.X% faster or experienced less drag with polished fins. I didn't sorry, I have experimented it myself.

Also I don't want to spent to much time with such minimal improvements. But if anyone can make a nice testreport we can publish it on my website: www.speedsurfingblog.com

I decided comming period NOT to try out much little things.

BTW I Changed from Tectonics to Select and improved my PB. The pre 2007 selects are sometimes not that clean. But I have measured all my 2009 fins and difference wasn't measureble <0,1mm

Yes I learned with mat/sanded fins, it works...

Cheers,

Erik
Erik Loots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 08:26 PM   #94
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

erik are you sponsoed by select?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 08:44 PM   #95
Erik Loots
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Netherlands, Alkmaar
Posts: 109
Send a message via MSN to Erik Loots
Default

I was on tectonics which I still really like, one day I tried a select fin from a testrider. I felt in difficult conditions the Select giving a more constant performance. Tectonics sometimes threw me of on higher speed when wind suddenly increased. Now I see big names in the Netherlands using the tectonics and they do crash more often (compared to me)

I asked in my local shop about those select fins, they offered me a nice deal for select fins.

The best thing about select they can make anything. With tectonics you have basicly only one very good speedfin. I tried a few days ago the new Select S09 fin, what a performance!! definitly a winning slalomfin, very good steering!. You don't hear much but even some worldcuppers use &got some select fins.

Yes some select fins make a noise, but if you look to all other aspects it is a very fast foil. about 50% of my foils I finish myself, its not needed in most cases. It gives a good feeling, when the fin is totally checked

Cheers,

Erik
Erik Loots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 10:46 PM   #96
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To whom it may concern

The laminar flow of polymer solutions is exploited by animals such as fish and dolphins, who exude viscous solutions from their skin to aid flow over their bodies while swimming. It has been used in yacht racing by owners who want to gain a speed advantage by pumping a polymer solution such as low molecular weight polyoxyethylene in water, over the wetted surface of the hull. It is however, a problem for mixing of polymers, because turbulence is needed to distribute fine filler (for example) through the material. Inventions such as the "cavity transfer mixer" have been developed to produce multiple folds into a moving melt so as to improve mixing efficiency. The device can be fitted onto extruders to aid mixing.

The example above leads to another possibility:

Microgrind the wetted area ( board or fin ) then spray it with a semi viscous solution such as Icex
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 11:17 PM   #97
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Talking to bloke reckoning to be an hydrodynamist. (I know him from uni days)
Anyhow his take on it was ;
Polished less drag but !!!
You aren`t comparing like with like once a fin is "rough".
Rougher builds up thicker boandary layer ; dependant on speed and viscosity of fluid. The thicker boundary layer effectively increases thickness of fin throughout its chordlength.This makes fin potentially less susceptable to changes in angle of attack and more tolerant of higher angles of attack.(If surface flow is maintained)In effect it behaves more like a thicker (more rounded leading edge)fin.

He also suggested thicker boundary layer "might" delay onset of cavitation/aeration but wasn`t sure !!!???

I`ll phone him back and ask about additives as in last post !! Plenty of additives in coast around us already though !!!

Perhaps we`re all right !!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2009, 04:28 AM   #98
Erik Loots
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Netherlands, Alkmaar
Posts: 109
Send a message via MSN to Erik Loots
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post

He also suggested thicker boundary layer "might" delay onset of cavitation/aeration but wasn`t sure !!!???
Intresting... it would confirm the feeling I have got about the finish of a foil...
Erik Loots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th November 2009, 03:16 AM   #99
Farlo
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 528
Default

Just seen nanostructured surfaces that are completely non wettable. I wonder what the effect can be on lift/drag. It must be different because air get trapped into the structure so there is virtually no boundary layer.

Last edited by Farlo; 6th November 2009 at 03:34 AM.
Farlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2009, 07:18 PM   #100
sailquik
Speed Demon
 
sailquik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 37
Default

Xfoil can be used to calculate cavitation speeds for windsurfing foils. These calculations are as I understand it correlated with actual tank tests. The speeds calculated correlate very closely with those 'hit the wall' experiences some top speed sailors have had and which can be observed in their trackfiles. (eg. Chris Lockwood in the canal a couple of years ago).
There is no sudden loss of control when cavitation starts to affect a windsurfing fin. Spin-out does not occur. Ventilation is a different phenomenon. There might possibly be some vibration effects but if you can feel that when rattling over corrugated chop at 45+ knots you are indeed a very sensitive new age man. ;-)
Xfoil calculations have shown that AOA of windsurfing fins at 45-50 knots are indeed very small and in the range of 1 degree. Assy foils have even less AOA.
The amount of force required to propel a windsurfer at 50 knots is actually quite small. Most of that force we feel is sideways force. The resultant force is only a fraction of that. I have decided it should be fairly easy to experimentally find the order of that force simply by towing my speedboard behind a boat with a spring scale attached to the tow rope. A project for the next calm day.
So we don't usually have an excess of power to 'push through' any extra drag created by the onset of cavitation, however minor. Damage to the fin surface may not be apparent because the inception of cavitation is probably not severe enough to do that damage. Damage requires power and we don't have any to spare. It is all used up by the increase in drag caused with the incipient cavitation which makes the 'brick wall'.
Those of us that speed sail here at Sandy Point are quite familiar with the feeling that you have hit a 'wall' in some situations. It's not board drag though because on the next run after one of the many variables or conditions have changed, you suddenly find that 'wall' gone. Same board, same fin, different conditions. Maybe the wind had swung a bit more broad and increased so one can now unload the fin slightly. Some of us think we can tell the difference when water turbulance conditions change. There are many things we can probably never quantify but we can get a 'feel' for them with experience and objective clear thinking from careful observations. There are about a dozen guys here who probably get more time over 40 knots, often in quite marginal conditions (less than 30 knots of wind) than just about anywhere else in the world. Some patterns definitely emerge and many of them confirm the theory from the science.
Sanded v's polished: Working with extremely accurate and optimized speed fins we have tried both. The jury is still out which means the difference is most likely minimal, or at least very hard to pin down in an objective way due to constantly varying conditions. Most of the sailors here go to great lengths to carefully prepare their fins to be as true to design, fair and blemish free as possible. Even those that 'sand' their fins use very fine wet and dry paper (1000-1200 grit) I have had some PB's on mirror finish polished fins and have also done the same after grinding the tip through the sand on the bottom at high speed. (I try to avoid that though if possible! ;-)) Often, there are combinations of factors like the water state, wind angle and the big one: wind strength that over ride the dulled, less than theoretically optimized fin for a PB run. Who knows if we may have gone 2 knots faster on that run if we hadn't 'naturally wet and dry'd' the fin though??
__________________
The older I get, the better I was.

Last edited by sailquik; 7th November 2009 at 07:29 PM.
sailquik is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 09:03 AM.