Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9th November 2009, 08:32 PM   #1
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
Default Exocet Warp-Sl vs. Starboard iSonic

Has anyone tried both the 2010 Starboard iSonics and the 2010 Exocet Warp-Sl and can make any comments?

I bring this up because the weight of the Exocets is really low and I wanted to know how they performed compared to the iSonics.
JP Super-X 106l, North F8 Ram: 5.8m,
175cm, 54kg
agrelon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2009, 03:14 PM   #2
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 537

Hello Agrelon. I tried the Warp SL 66 2009 recently, which is the same as 2010 I think. It is very light indeed (~6 Kgs) nervous, undoubtly fast but feels very stiff even in moderate chops. The most astounding is its ability to keep planing in almost no wind. I haven't tried it in rough conditions yet but suspect you may find it uncomfortable at your weight (or even at mine). From what I read these boards would feel more like wood/carbon iSonic's.

Last edited by Farlo; 12th November 2009 at 06:55 PM.
Farlo is offline   Reply With Quote



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
*board 162 vs Exocet Warp Formula dymatize Free Forum 2 12th December 2008 10:51 PM
new exocet warp fw vs 162 Unregistered Free Forum 1 17th February 2008 10:22 PM
Hesitating between AE117 and Exocet Cross 117 ? cori Ask Our Team 1 11th May 2007 07:30 PM
Kombat 117 vs Exocet cross 118/117 cori Free Forum 2 23rd November 2006 01:50 PM
SB Hybrid Carve and Phantom VS. Kona Exocet GEN Ask Our Team 6 24th August 2006 12:40 PM

All times are GMT +7. The time now is 06:00 AM.