Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1st June 2010, 12:22 PM   #1
kiwiben
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Default 100 kg on a hypersonic 105?

Hi, there is a 105litre hypersonic for auction here, for US$250. Cheap enough to buy for a laugh, but just expensive enough to ask your opinions first.

My problem: I am 100kg. This means I will be limited to waterstarts, which in turn means it will be a board for medium to strong winds only.

Can anyone tell me if this board will suck for such a heavy guy like me, even when I am in strong enough winds to waterstart?

I should add I already have a Carve 121 which is good for me in lightish to medium winds, so the hyper would be for when it blows properly. Tell me, will I have fun?

Very interested in your responses...
kiwiben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2010, 04:12 PM   #2
PG
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 234
Default

They Hypersonic hardly makes sense as a heavyweight's highwind board, as a partner to a Carve 121.
In your shoes I would instead look for a freeride or Freestyle-Wave in the 100-105 liter range (60-65 cm in width). It will be a waterstart only board that takes you well into 5.0-5.3 sail territory.
PG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2010, 09:18 PM   #3
mark h
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW England,
Posts: 708
Default

Hi Ben

Mention "Hypersonic" and you'll get a real mixed bag of responses Like Marmite, people either loved it or hated it. For sure, it needed a different approach to get the best out of it c/w normal slalom boards. But once dialled, it was a shed load of fun The HS had a big range and is probably the only "one size for all" slalom board, great concept in its day.

The MK1 HS was one of my all time favourite boards. I had a D-ram 125 and a wood 105. Other than big sail slogging, the HS125 felt pretty similar to the HS105. I was using Gaastra Nitro's then, and used a 5.5m to 9.3m on both the HS105/125.

Now a days, a 5.5m on a 78cm board would be considered wrong as boards this wide are XL slalom. But the HS's huge double concaves allowed you to run on small or large fins, partly were its huge range came from. 9m sail, 78cm wide board and a 34cm fin (todays XL slalom can not do this) which mean't "fast" downwinders

It was very good in chop as its huge double concaves made feel like it was riding on a cushion of air, very comfy for such a wide board.

Not sure what type/size sails your on, but the HS likes cambered sails. A 7+m would really be the smallest size for the HS105. But this combo will take a lot of wind, 15k to 25k winds.

At 250, it could be cheap fast thrill's (in a good way)
__________________
Cheers - Mark H

The toys:
iSW44 - - iSW49 - iSW53 - iSW58 - iS107 - iS137 - F161.
North Warps: F2012 5.2m, 5.7m, 6.3m, 7m, 8m, 8.6m, 9.5m F2006 11m.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by mark h; 1st June 2010 at 09:23 PM.
mark h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2010, 04:05 AM   #4
kiwiben
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Default

Thanks guys,

I get the feeling the hypersonic is one of the great boards of all time, or at least one of the most influential... I should buy it and stick it in a frame behind glass and hang it on my wall for future worshipping. The fact some people hate it just makes it more brilliant if you ask me. It took alot of balls for SB to make such a radical design for its time.

Thanks PG for pointing out the downside of this board for me, but at $250 (ie virtually free) those reasons are not enough to cancel out what Mark H is saying.

But yes PG, i will look out for a board like you suggest if I can get one this cheap. For real strong wind I currently use an old 80 litre wave board. It weighs nothing, I love it!
kiwiben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2010, 10:03 AM   #5
Maximus
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 162
Default

Hey Bro

Get the board. Make sure you have some cammed sails. Even if you hate it at 1st, keep perservering, as you will learn more on the Hyper than any other board. As you get better on it, you will plane up earlier than your carve!..

Enjoy the challenge
Maximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2010, 10:46 AM   #6
kiwiben
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Thumbs up

OK Maximus... I will!

If it truly does plane up earlier than my carve I will be blown away. I guess it makes sense though if it's wider, and those concaves must help stop the board sinking at low speed.

Or is that an embarrassingly stupid and naive theory?
kiwiben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2010, 11:15 AM   #7
PG
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 234
Default

Everything Mark writes is correct. But at the same time I believe that Mark is significantly lighter. And that makes a difference.
On the other hand, you already have a small board to use when it really blows (and the wind is steady!). Go for it, you can sell it for half of what you bought it for, and it is still not an expensive test.
PG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2010, 03:56 PM   #8
mark h
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW England,
Posts: 708
Default

With all the light winds we've been getting this year in the UK, I wish I was lighter I'm 105kg & 194cm
__________________
Cheers - Mark H

The toys:
iSW44 - - iSW49 - iSW53 - iSW58 - iS107 - iS137 - F161.
North Warps: F2012 5.2m, 5.7m, 6.3m, 7m, 8m, 8.6m, 9.5m F2006 11m.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
mark h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2010, 04:28 AM   #9
kiwiben
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Default

you fat b...stard!
kiwiben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2010, 04:36 AM   #10
kiwiben
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Default

Actually Mark you are identical to me in height and weight (100kg was just a rounded off figure)... we are both perfect physical specimens in other words. I should listen carefully to everything you say from now on... I will go back and read every gem you have posted in the past too.

One thing I never understood was: Is bigger model of the same board optimised for a bigger sailor in the same wind, or an average sailor in less wind. Maybe that's another thread though...
kiwiben is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Hypersonic?! Unregistered Free Forum 15 14th September 2009 05:36 PM
Hypersonic 133 vs. F 148 (both 05) luis_martino Ask Our Team 8 20th July 2007 06:42 AM
HYPERSONIC!!!!! windsurferdagg Windsurfing School 9 16th July 2007 09:34 AM
Hypersonic 105 SteveM Ask Our Team 22 8th April 2007 01:09 AM
Hypersonic 105 V 111 Aaron Richards Windsurfing School 2 25th January 2007 04:12 AM


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 02:11 AM.