isonic for 7.0

berg · 6th October 2010, 02:49 AM

My weight is 83 kg.
I like to sail mt 7.0 sail very well powered.
What will be the isonic for this sail
Mostly sailed on a big lake
I like a board form the year 2009 and if it is I like to hear why 2010 or 2011 will be better

Like to hear

Berg

Remi · 6th October 2010, 04:55 PM

Hi Berg,

The option of only one board and one sail at your weight, the best board for this will be the iSonic 90

All the best

berg · 6th October 2010, 11:40 PM

What about the 94 from 2009?
Like to hear

Berg

Remi · 7th October 2010, 04:42 AM

Hi Berg,

If you are looking for second hand board yes go for it. 2010 this board was a success and close the performance gap that we have before between the 101 and the 86.

All the best

berg · 9th October 2010, 02:53 PM

What is the difference between 2009 and 2010 isonic 94. Is it that the 2009 has a higher rockerline in the nose and a longer flat in the rear?

What will be the difference in sailing for a 85 kg like me

Thanks

Berg

kvda · 9th October 2010, 10:18 PM

The 2010 isonic 94 is a different concept, it's a 'small 101'. The older 94's are classic shaped slalomboards, relatively taller and less wide. I'd go for the 2010 94!! Bigger range.

kvda · 9th October 2010, 10:20 PM

By the way, for me -95 kgs- the 101 is perfect with 7.0

berg · 10th October 2010, 01:07 AM

thanks foor the info.
To me the 94 from 2010 sems to have a very low nose , and I think it will catch sooner the the 94. I do not have the experience. But I can get a 94 from 2009 for cheap and try this.
Today I saw the 2010 in the shop and realy liked the tail with the short flat planing

I had the 101 from 2007, and wanted a litlle smaller, wish I never sold it. since than the shit and search and doubts started.

Well we shall see

Berg

Remi · 10th October 2010, 01:56 PM

Hi Berg,

In your case definitely go for the isonic 94 2010. The 2009 was nice but not enough performances with a narrow range compare to the 2010 one.

The 2010 have the same rocker as the iSonic 101 2009/2010, so basically it's a smaller 101.

All the best

ThierryP · 23rd October 2010, 06:57 PM

Berg,

The 2009 94 was a dog, the 2010 94 was a rocket, an absolute peach. Go for the 2010, no question.

6th October 2010, 02:49 AM	#1
berg Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 41	isonic for 7.0 My weight is 83 kg. I like to sail mt 7.0 sail very well powered. What will be the isonic for this sail Mostly sailed on a big lake I like a board form the year 2009 and if it is I like to hear why 2010 or 2011 will be better Like to hear Berg

6th October 2010, 04:55 PM	#2
Remi STARBOARD DEVELOPMENT Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Thailand Posts: 2,334	Hi Berg, The option of only one board and one sail at your weight, the best board for this will be the iSonic 90 All the best __________________ Rémi Can answer if you have any questions on this following boards : Carve 111, 121, 131, 141, 151 & 161 Futura 93, 101, 111, 121, 131 & 141. iSonic 80, 87, 90, 97, 107, 110, 117, 127 & 137 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. UltraSonic 147 Formula Experience One Design Phantom Race 377/320 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Phantom 295 : To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Formula 167 & 167 Wide : To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Racing Serinity Cat Concept To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

7th October 2010, 04:42 AM	#4
Remi STARBOARD DEVELOPMENT Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Thailand Posts: 2,334	Hi Berg, If you are looking for second hand board yes go for it. 2010 this board was a success and close the performance gap that we have before between the 101 and the 86. All the best __________________ Rémi Can answer if you have any questions on this following boards : Carve 111, 121, 131, 141, 151 & 161 Futura 93, 101, 111, 121, 131 & 141. iSonic 80, 87, 90, 97, 107, 110, 117, 127 & 137 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. UltraSonic 147 Formula Experience One Design Phantom Race 377/320 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Phantom 295 : To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Formula 167 & 167 Wide : To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Racing Serinity Cat Concept To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

10th October 2010, 01:56 PM	#9
Remi STARBOARD DEVELOPMENT Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Thailand Posts: 2,334	Hi Berg, In your case definitely go for the isonic 94 2010. The 2009 was nice but not enough performances with a narrow range compare to the 2010 one. The 2010 have the same rocker as the iSonic 101 2009/2010, so basically it's a smaller 101. All the best __________________ Rémi Can answer if you have any questions on this following boards : Carve 111, 121, 131, 141, 151 & 161 Futura 93, 101, 111, 121, 131 & 141. iSonic 80, 87, 90, 97, 107, 110, 117, 127 & 137 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. UltraSonic 147 Formula Experience One Design Phantom Race 377/320 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Phantom 295 : To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Formula 167 & 167 Wide : To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Racing Serinity Cat Concept To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

6th October 2010, 11:40 PM	#3
berg Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 41	What about the 94 from 2009? Like to hear Berg

9th October 2010, 02:53 PM	#5
berg Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 41	What is the difference between 2009 and 2010 isonic 94. Is it that the 2009 has a higher rockerline in the nose and a longer flat in the rear? What will be the difference in sailing for a 85 kg like me Thanks Berg

9th October 2010, 10:18 PM	#6
kvda Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 173	The 2010 isonic 94 is a different concept, it's a 'small 101'. The older 94's are classic shaped slalomboards, relatively taller and less wide. I'd go for the 2010 94!! Bigger range.

9th October 2010, 10:20 PM	#7
kvda Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 173	By the way, for me -95 kgs- the 101 is perfect with 7.0

10th October 2010, 01:07 AM	#8
berg Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 41	thanks foor the info. To me the 94 from 2010 sems to have a very low nose , and I think it will catch sooner the the 94. I do not have the experience. But I can get a 94 from 2009 for cheap and try this. Today I saw the 2010 in the shop and realy liked the tail with the short flat planing I had the 101 from 2007, and wanted a litlle smaller, wish I never sold it. since than the shit and search and doubts started. Well we shall see Berg

23rd October 2010, 06:57 PM	#10
ThierryP Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 73	Berg, The 2009 94 was a dog, the 2010 94 was a rocket, an absolute peach. Go for the 2010, no question.