Go Back   Starboard Forums > Ask Our Team

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21st January 2007, 05:16 PM   #1
dave
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 18
Default for Ian re:s-type 126+137

If the rocker line of the smaller s-types is the same as the sonic 85, then what is the rocker on the 2 bigger boards.are they flatter and longer in the rocker. are they designed for early planing or just higher volume versions of the smaller boards. curiouse as the nominated sail range of these boards are small for their volume and width
cheers dave
dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2007, 05:26 AM   #2
Ian Fox
STARBOARD
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 532
Default RE: for Ian re:s-type 126+137

Hi Dave,

The basic rockerline template does not differ that much,especially the critical rockerflat and entry profiles are similar in template rockerline (considering varying V alters effective rockerline across/over the actual surface area - so use of "same" rockerline can be a bit debateable in one respect anyway, as two otherwise "identical" (rocker profile/template plus outline/volume/rail/thickness etc) boards could still offer noticeable differences in performance based on addition (or not) of significant V across the planing area.)

Obviously, the larger ST's make use of the increased width (and subsequent increase in surface area/s) - not just volume alone- to improve the light wind and relative early planing potential. The significant difference from ST to (say) and equivalent size (by volume and max width) iSonic is the presence of the stongly bevelled rail in the ST's, which reduces the ST's lightwind (or bigger sail/fin) performance a little, but significantly adds to the high/er wind, speed and chop ease of control, plus the ST's proven SuperX performance potential (which would not be so "easy" on a similar "sized" iSonic for example).

By comparison though, an equivalent iSonic (by volume/width) will generally offer marginally better big sail / fin handling and early planing/marginal condition performance, significantly because of the (relatively..) harder, wider rail section on the iS vs the ST.

While it's possible to run "larger than nominal" sails (fins) on the ST's to "force" their early planing (and many independent customers report good satisfaction from doing so..), we're confident that the nominated sail sizes are close to typically optimal for that range of boards.

In WA it would not be difficult to get the opportunity to test or demo an ST and/or iS to experience the subtle but real difference first hand.

Hope this answers your questions, please let us know if more info is required etc.

Cheers ~ Ian
Ian Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 06:13 PM.