Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10th February 2012, 04:59 PM   #1
ScotiaPhil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Starboard Go 2011/12 Shapes versus 2010

I hear lots of good things about the larger Go s. I'm looking for a larger light wind board 8-12kn that could also be fun for the family in the summer. I do want to be able to rig a big sail something like an 11m2 - my biggest is 9.0 at the moment.

I am wondering why the width/shape of the Starboard 171 2011/12 changed to smaller and longer causing a max sail de-rating from 11m2 to 10m2 from the 2010 model (91 to 85.5cm width).

Does anyone have experience on the 2011/12 Go with sails in the 10/11 range? Is the stated spec more of an "ideal" spec; i.e. can a larger sail be made to work? I am 210lb, so I can handle a larger sail.

My preference would be to go with a newer model, as I like the second fin box option if I want to teach anyone else to windsurf. But if there is a noticeable impact in maximum sail range, I may have to reconsider.

Any pointers would be appreciated. Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2012, 01:25 AM   #2
joe_windsurfer
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montréal (PQ) CANADA
Posts: 211
Default

personally do NOT have a GO
however ...
i am about the same weight and use a 10-oh
if winds are not steady enough, even the 10-0h can be awkward

the 85 cm has a tail or OFO that would suffice for a 10-oh, butt not 11-oh
as you correctly guessed
do you really wanna put $1500-$2000 worth of sail on a GO ??

can you GO over?
probably yes, butt again - BIG investment :-(

know people are not so excited about longboards any more, but i find the 10-oh works better on my Fanatic CAT than on my 160 liter/79 cm shortboard

personally NEVER anticipated ANYONE putting an 11-oh on a GO
butt then again, what the heck do i know ?? :-)

Formula ?? can the family play on that ??
__________________
joe windsurfer @ 100 kg
2006 AHD type-F FF 160/79cm, 2012 JP SLW92, 2000 Fanatic BEE 124 LTD + Mistral Equipe I LCS
HSM Fire 6.3, Gaastra Flow 3x 7.0, TR-6 8.4, TR4 10.0

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
joe_windsurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 01:22 AM   #3
ScotiaPhil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Joe, you hit the nail on the head. That's exactly what I am wondering. Are people indeed putting big sails on a go and having any success with it? And is there a difference in the models?

For me performance is secondary, I just want a fun board for the summer days when the winds aren't super strong. I'm all set for the fall storms with a Mistral Screamer. Was considering a Formula Experience or large Futura, but as you said the play value wouldn't be there.

So still looking for any experience on a Go in the 10-11m range.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Evo 80 2008 versus Qaud 82 2011 Wannalooper Ask Our Team 2 31st July 2011 03:02 PM
quad 2011 vs 2010 griff Ask Our Team 2 18th July 2011 06:05 PM
kode 80 2010 v 2011 marksw Ask Our Team 6 23rd April 2011 02:49 PM
2010 IS or 2011 Futura? Yugger Ask Our Team 2 13th March 2011 07:37 PM
2010 v. 2011 Starboard Go (175 v. 171L) jpon2 Ask Our Team 1 1st January 2011 09:37 AM


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 03:55 AM.