|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boreen Point, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 23
|
Has anybody tried?
How does it compare with 2012 model... wind range speed etc etc?? I weigh 62kg and am thinking of one as a my "big" board in a two board quiver. Small board is a 2008 iSonic 76. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AUSTRIA, Lake Neusiedler
Posts: 297
|
Hi RWW,
the 2013, I tested the 2013 in wood construction, was easy going. I tested the board at Alacati with 8,6 m and 7,8m. The board had a great upwind performance and excellent speed and control at the exit of the jibe. The board felt extremely easy going, had all the time speed and had a similar character compared with the 2012 model. The speed felt great. It´s a very fast board with a big windrange. What´s your biggest sailsize you are going to use on the 107? It definitely fits excellent as your biggest board! All the best and just come back with further questions, Chris
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boreen Point, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 23
|
Thanks Chris
At the moment my biggest sail that I have and am using with an older IS94 is a 7.0. Am thinking that I will try that initially with a 107 and eventually maybe go to about a 7.8 if I feel the need. Cheers Russell |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boreen Point, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 23
|
A couple of more questions for the experts.
Would appreciate views on likely wind range that I could expect from the 107 with my light weight (62kg). Once conditions reach a steady 15 knots or more I'm likely to be on the IS76, so what I'm looking for in a bigger board is something that will get me through the lulls in patchy or gusty conditions, but will still be manageable in chop and gusts to say,18 knots. Also want to be able to use in relatively light conditions down to ??? As an alternative to the 107, I've been considering the new 2013 IS 110. I figure that, with it's greater width, it will plane earlier and give me better light wind performance, but feel that it will also become unmanageable for me in the gusts and chops much earlier than the 107. Thoughts?? Last edited by rww; 20th November 2012 at 06:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AUSTRIA, Lake Neusiedler
Posts: 297
|
Guess the 107 is easier to control in jibes and easier to get on the rail. Overall control will depend on the wind. But with your actual seize of sails I would go for the 107.
Hope it helps, Chris
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boreen Point, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 23
|
Thanks Chris
Yes, for those reasons, I've decided to go for the 107. You've confirmed my decision!! Took delivery today and can't wait to try it!! Last edited by rww; 28th November 2012 at 06:50 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| iSonic 2013 | mark h | Ask Our Team | 69 | 21st January 2013 08:06 PM |
| Isonic 117 2013 : what's new? | Unregistered | Free Forum | 1 | 15th November 2012 12:08 AM |
| Quad 74 2013 & Kode 72 2013 same recommended sails? | van | Ask Our Team | 1 | 27th August 2012 01:21 PM |
| Une question pour Rémi : IS 107 2013 ou IS 110 2013 | Gilles Finet | French Forum | 3 | 20th August 2012 04:33 AM |
| iSonic 2013 | Remi | French Forum | 10 | 15th August 2012 04:02 PM |