Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23rd July 2007, 03:53 PM   #1
Guest
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,321
Default Heavyweights Waveboard

Hi
Is there really a heavyweights (100k +)waveboarddesigned for just that ?
Seems to me the big wave boards (not boards for big waves) are compromised to gain mass market appeal.
For example K107 ?? (Cross over)(RRD FSW110 same)
But there isn`t an Evo 107 ?
I know argument is big wave boards dont work but its normally small testers deciding so ?
Suspect its more to do with diminishing returns on what would become a very specialised board.
What is biggest "real" wave board ???
Evo 91 ? Would give me 20 litres negative buoyancy. Sort of like a 70 kg bloke on 50 litres ??? Thats best on market at moment ???:@
Guest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 04:54 PM   #2
Happy
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 31
Default RE: Heavyweights Waveboard

There will be an Evo 100 coming out soon. Maybe that would fit your bill?
Happy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 07:29 PM   #3
Ola_H
TEAM
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,191
Default RE: Heavyweights Waveboard

Right. Guest, hold your breath until aug 15 and we will tell you everything about the new big wave board. Definitely no compromises...

A note on volume relative weight: It seems that bigger sailors are often on relatively smaller boards and vice versa. I'm not 100% sure why, but since it applies to amateurs and pros alike, I think its its a kind of physical fact (probably something to do with planing area and such things). But even if you just compare volumes, it is the ratio of the volume of the board and the weight of you and your gear (say 20 kg). A 100l board for you (110 kg?) would mean a ratio of 100/130=0,77 which equate me (70kg) riding a 70 liter board (which actually is a good all round size for me which works in pretty light winds too).
Ola_H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 11:12 PM   #4
Guest
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,321
Default RE: Heavyweights Waveboard

Hi Ola
Agree with your ratio idea but your calculation assumes a constant "rig/board/suit/harness" weight which is why your maths appears to help heavier sailor.
In actual fact heavier sailor would (all things being equal) have
a) heavier board b) bigger sail/heavier rig c) a larger wetsuit holding more water.

Looking forward to seeing new board but suspect at 100litres it will be on small side for me.(Depends on other factors too)

By experience I feel 105 is about my practical (optimum) minimum.(My all up sailing weight will be approaching 130k (including board weight)
Guest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2007, 02:27 AM   #5
Guest
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,321
Default RE: Heavyweights Waveboard

Its a bit OT but perhaps we will see the day when sailors buy different boards but of same volume.(possible now)
Volume really is very sailor dependant and not necessarily condition.
Look at isonic range ; low volume high width big sails high speeds. (and good weight carriers)
In years to come volume might well be purely rider dependant. Other design elements decide what use board is put to. Going that way now !?

RRD FSW 110probably biggest/nearest to wave board. Exocet cross 106 ??? And I think if you check exocet site they do a pure wave of 105 litres. (Bet its slow though)
Guest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2007, 04:46 AM   #6
Ola_H
TEAM
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,191
Default RE: Heavyweights Waveboard

Right, assuming a constant gear weight is an approximation, but even using real gear weight for the light and heavy sailor respectively, the ratio calculation would yield that a heavier sailor "needs" less "added volume" than a lighter one.

But regardless, there is a lot more than volume that matters and the new EVO is developed specifically to be a real wave board for heavier people that want a bit of "extra board" under them.
Ola_H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2007, 05:35 AM   #7
Floyd
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 459
Default RE: Heavyweights Waveboard

Sorry Ola dont agree with that.
Same ratio will give same flotation regardless of rider weight.By definition it must. I also think (by observation) that given equal volume/load ratio heavier sailor will plane up later because he`s also going to have a worse power to weight ratio from rig (initially) until drag takes over.Heavier sailor will have a better power to drag ratio but lighter one a better power to weight. Its why heavier sailors set faster speeds but lighter ones plane earlier. (even given equal volume to weight ratios)
Anyways
My point.Often thought its the wave sailor who needs that bit of extra flotation.Wind shadows on waves ; getting through shore break etc but historically its always been wave boards are smallest.
Slalom sailor; once powered up; is unlikely to need extra flotation.Think its a lot to do with market inertia.
I do agree with guest re we will (perhaps do now) be buying boards of same volume for different disciplines.
If a sailor needs 95 litres its prettty irrelevant as to wether he (or she) is sailing slalom; freestyle or wave.
Personally I like a bit more reserve volume in wave board but I`m a very poor wave sailor. Flat water blasting you hardly need any !! Its already happening.(Missile 64 litres.Dave White 125 kg)
Kombat 106 is a great heavies wave board.(Should be power box though !!!???)
PS Dunkerbeck uses 97 litres in his wave board ! (Until its howling) I think he`s 95kg.
Floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2007, 03:33 PM   #8
Ola_H
TEAM
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,191
Default RE: Heavyweights Waveboard

Floyd. Yes, in an absolute standstill, how far you sink (or how "high" you float) is a matter of the volume to total weight ration only. But my point is that when it comes to sailing the thing, volume is only one part of the equation and a pretty small one too. Even far, far below the planing threshold, dynamic effects of the surface area of the board will help it not sink. And for planing sailing the volume does not matter much at all (other than as a general guide for board _size_).

That wave boards are small depends on that it is simply difficult to put in a lot of volume in a board and keep it performing on a wave. So, wave sailors simply learn how to handle small boards. Slalom boards could be pretty small, people that ride the iS50 speed often testifies it works in surprisingly low wind speeds if you just ensure you never loose planing. But for practical slalom sailing you will loose planing now and then and then some reserve volume will help you accelerate from faster which is crucial. It is especially helpful when you are carrying a big and heavy sail (like a cammed 8.0 sail).

But it is an interesting question wether one given sailor could choose all his boards in similar sizes with just different designs. I talked to Jason Polakow a while ago. He said "all my boards are between 73 and 76 liters". Same with Levi Siver. Not much variation. That goes for quite a few of the wave sailing pros that use custom boards. It is more difficult to do with production stuff but i recently sold my Acid 74 to a guy already owning a EVO 74 and he is super happy with his quiver and the two boards fills different roles for him. The pros that are on production boards tend to use a much wider span of sizes (like 75-85-95 or 70-80-90 for an 85kg sailor) and its very much a matter of taste and style how big boards they use on a given set of conditions.

In practice most of us tends to want some extra volume in our light wind boards though and using the "Polakov model" would probably not be the best thing for most of us.

But when everything is said and done, what matter is what a given board is designed to do. You could probably build a super light wind slalom board for a light weight sailor around 70-80 liters, but with the available designs, even a light weight is likely to be more effective on the iS101. That is what I also meant with my comment on the new EVO. For a performance wave boards, there is a lot of volume in there but maybe more importantly is that many other design elements of the board has been adjusted to fit the criteria which is "an effective performance wave board for heavier sailors" (ie not _primiarily_ a super floater for semi-heavy guys).
Ola_H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2007, 05:18 PM   #9
Floyd
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 459
Default RE: Heavyweights Waveboard

Hi Ola
Totally agree with everything you say; and very well put.
One thing I would like to point out though is the fact that the characteristics you put into a board (flat rocker/width/wide tail etc) to enable a board to perform well for a heavyweight will be the exact things to cause the board problems when used at limit .An extra 5 lites volume to give beneficial float will have less effect for a really heavy bloke when using board on limit.An extra couple of cm in width certainly will.(Width effects are non-linear; faster you go more effect they have. Volume is constant)
Fifteen years ago I sailed biggest wave board available at time (85 litres). Everyone then said that was limit for wave a board. (It was more to with size of blanks available and limite dmarket for "big" wave boards.)
We`ve reached point now where Freestyle Waves upto 110 litres are on market; but all these boards (FSW`s)will function for lighter sailors;(used in different modes.) purely to make boards attractive to a big enough market to be succesfull.
An EVO 107 will only ever sell to 100k+ wave sailors.And there just aren`t enough of them to warrant building a board. When someone says a big wave board does not work ask them
a) Have they tried?
b) How heavy they are?
The are no scientific reasons to say a 110 litre wave board will not work. It will work but will need 110kg load on it.And *B would only sell a dozen or so of them.
Take care.
Floyd
Besides Kombats are fine (But should have PB)

Floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2007, 07:24 PM   #10
Ola_H
TEAM
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,191
Default RE: Heavyweights Waveboard

Pretty much agree, except that adding volume (by adding thickness) actually does more to a boards performance than most people think. I've sailed boards that were pretty much identical except for thickness and the thinner board always feels better and especially at the control limit the thickness hurts. It creates extra leverage for the chop, sort of. So again, making a heavy weights wave board (that will function as an all round wave board for them, ie has an as big range as possible, including good stuff) is about changing lots of small things. Its not only scaling up, not only adding width, not only adding thickness, not only, adjusting the rocker and bottom shape etc. Its a combination of all of the above.

But you are right in that one problem is that too few has tried to make such boards. Even the "blown up" wave boards that some of the best custom shapers make does not really look that good. I think it's a matter of to few good enough big blokes around to test the boards and drive the development. Thats why it is very good to have Antoine in the team now.

Regarding making a 107 instead of the soon to be revealed 100, well maybe if would be better for some, but before making judgement, have a look at the 100 - live. It is BIG piece of performance wave board.

As for the Kombats, they are probably the most wave oriented fsw boards on the market with rockers and v taken directly from the Pure Acids, with thin rails etc etc. There is just a bit more tail and nose relative the widths (+ extra footstrap positions) if you compare with the Acids. So, no surprise they work well in waves and (like the Acids) they especially come alive in a bit faster waves.
Ola_H is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 11:57 AM.