Signature

[Madis]

heh what do u think of this signature?
i was bored and made it ^^

[Madis]

PS! Taty there with the 2008 flare

[windsurferdagg]

man I still can't figure out how to get an avatar... let alone get a picture in the signature...

does the avatar need to be exactly 100 by 100 pixels?

[Madis]

well yeah, i can modify the avatar for you, just send me the picture my avatars actual size :

and the signature:

[windsurferdagg]

hmmm... alright, I will have to think about the pic I want to use. If I don't get it in 15 minutes, I will send'em over

Thanks a lot

thomas

[mark h]

Just testing to see if my pis is there now.

[steveC]

Hi Madis,

In the latest post above, You've presented some interesting shots. However, I would lose the "Madis" signatures in the frame of some of the photos. In these type of scenarios, the photo guy can claim his "stamp" by locating it outside the frame of reference , as this is the proper and accepted balance between the photographer and subject. Outside of the intimate circumstances between the photographer and subject, a design guy must rely on higher levels of recognition that aren't always readily apparent in the individual images themselves.

Not trying to be too negative here, but that's more in line with accepted protocol.

[windsurferdagg]

I must have read wrong, I tried soo many times to get that avatar up. Just realized that it has to be exaclty 100 by 100 pixels. So if you have photoshop, just crop the image, and great image size to 100 by 100 pixels...

and mark h? nice typo ;-) your pis isn't there now :-)

Thomas

[Madis]

steveC wrote:
Hi Madis,

In the latest post above, You've presented some interesting shots. However, I would lose the "Madis" signatures in the frame of some of the photos. In these type of scenarios, the photo guy can claim his "stamp" by locating it outside the frame of reference , as this is the proper and accepted balance between the photographer and subject. Outside of the intimate circumstances between the photographer and subject, a design guy must rely on higher levels of recognition that aren't always readily apparent in the individual images themselves.

Not trying to be too negative here, but that's more in line with accepted protocol.

Come to think of it, I agree with you, so i lost the "Madis" ^^

Thanks!