|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: galicia spain
Posts: 88
|
on boards magazine article they conclude that 1kg board weight is no relevant to planning and top speed
whats your opinion' also starboards are not usually the lightest but isonics always come out very well on test . is there an answer? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: galicia spain
Posts: 88
|
sorry for the double thread
regards juan1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4
|
i think i agree with the magazine report, although a large weight difference may make a difference i dont think the sort of weight differences that different constructions of one board offer. If i were given a choice between a more expensive, lighter and more fragile board or a cheaper, slightly heavier and more durable board i'd take the cheaper one everytime. It is true what they said in the article that no one has really tested the big claims of earlier planning and greater top end for ltd constructions before so i'm happy that they did it and made the normally windsurfer like me feel a bit better with the cheaper stuff. Much of windsurfing is the rider's skill, the board is just a tool, it doesnt sail for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 459
|
If it says so in Boards mag it must be true !!! Just like all their tests !
Lighter boards feel much better and the`re a darned sight easier to carry down beach. All up weight of approaching 120k and I dont think 1k will make much dfference but every bit helps. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|