Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14th October 2009, 10:15 PM   #1
Floyd
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 459
Question Speedsailing . Where are we ???

With kite having broken 50knots And Sebastien Cattelan claiming 53.37 k with 61.7 Vmax

(see http://www.surfertoday.com/kiteboard...peed-challenge)

Along with Hydroptere now holding record (ratified) at 51.36 with crew claiming 61 knot peaks. (http://www.hydroptere.com/_en/) was wondering what windsurfers were doing about it ??? Anybody getting near 60knots ???

I know my speeds havent gone up at all in 4 years ??? Anything in pipeline Starboard ???
Floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 01:54 PM   #2
davide
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Floyd View Post
With kite having broken 50knots And Sebastien Cattelan claiming 53.37 k with 61.7 Vmax

(see http://www.surfertoday.com/kiteboard...peed-challenge)

Along with Hydroptere now holding record (ratified) at 51.36 with crew claiming 61 knot peaks. (http://www.hydroptere.com/_en/) was wondering what windsurfers were doing about it ??? Anybody getting near 60knots ???

I know my speeds havent gone up at all in 4 years ??? Anything in pipeline Starboard ???
Not much to do: the Kites can sail in absurdly shallow water, while the sailboats have oustanding efficiency compared to both Kites and windsurfers. Which leaves windsurf dead on the water until it can either sail in 2" of water or develop some new revolutionary rig+board that will probably will not look like a windsurfer at all.

By the way: my personal take is that now that sailboats are going 50 knots in open ocean it is pointless to compare with windsurf or kites that sail in canals or ultra-shallow venues. Sailboats seem to be doing the real sailing, while the rest is confined to very artificial conditions.
davide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 03:15 PM   #3
Farlo
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 528
Default

Color science: "white bottom is lighter and faster"... Or nanoparticle layers that will almost eliminate hull and fin drag.
Davide, this is a good point: at the other end, iceboats are cruising in one mil deep water much faster than any other sailed engine.

Last edited by Farlo; 15th October 2009 at 04:14 PM.
Farlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 03:41 PM   #4
Floyd
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 459
Cool

Dont think Hydroptere did 50k in what you`d call open sea. Fair enough it wasn`t a canal but it was in a massive harbour.They flipped it in open sea 18 months ago; outer fin (partly resposible for opposing heeling) cant maintain negative lift (down force) in big seas, ie in wave troughs it looses force; boat can (and has ) flipped. For its size it still needs relatively flat water.
(Yes I know outer ama is also full of water; but foil does do its bit)
In rough conditions suspect WS is still fastest ???
Floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 05:36 PM   #5
Papounet
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Floyd View Post
Dont think Hydroptere did 50k in what you`d call open sea. Fair enough it wasn`t a canal but it was in a massive harbour.
In rough conditions suspect WS is still fastest ???
Really BIIIIIG Harbour....
http://maps.google.fr/?ie=UTF8&ll=43...20757&t=h&z=12



In rough conditions.....


- Transatlantic W to E, Ambrose Light – Lizard Point
=> "Banque Populaire 5" 131 ft Tri, Pascal Bidegorry FRA, 3d 15h 25m 48s 32.94 kts
=> 24 H, 908.2nm 37.84 kts
Try to do the same on 500 m

Look at the GPS in open water
http://www.wat.tv/video/banque-popul...c7_11ehg_.html

And there, they cn drink a cup of tea at 41 Knots
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPIJXf3QTzo

Last edited by Papounet; 15th October 2009 at 07:37 PM.
Papounet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 06:08 PM   #6
viking
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Thailand, France
Posts: 148
Default

Yes, I can be said that the Hydroptere record was beatten in open water.

So, why windsurfing does not seem able to participate to this record hunt? I see one main reason: money. The record of Antoine Albeau can be improved (it was not make by really ideal conditions: choppy canal, run too downwind a absolute freezing cold) but windsurfers would need a big amount of cash to do so to allow our champions to totally dedicate their time to this hunt - as the kiters do. We need to find the good spot (massive wind everyday) and to built there the good infrastructure and then stick Albeau 6 months there... But who would pay for this?
viking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 07:09 PM   #7
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What an excellent idea !
It should obviously be an Anglo-French effort with Guy Cribb and Antoine.
We will provide a nice windy location like the Falklands.
The French have lots of money so they can pay....
Simple really.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 07:28 PM   #8
Floyd
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 459
Red face

Hi Papounet
Yes I agree those speeds are damned impressive and even more so in conditions encountered but they aren`t the record. Point to remember with Hydroptere is that it easily doubles wind speed; believe on record day it was gusting to 32 knots ;windy but by no means howling . (especially for that region) Its the efficiency of Hydroptere which is trully astounding;resultant of foiling ???

Hydroptere (reputedly) has topped out at 60 knots +; they are now working towards breaking 100km/h barrier. Not sure wether craft you mentioned are foilers but I doubt it.(Dont think the long voyage tri`s are)
Hydroprere(the one built for 500 m and 1000m records) definitely is. Wonder if way forward for us is foiling ??? Wonder what a windsurfer could do if we could emulate this efficiency in ???

Do you really want to make a cup of tea whilst trying to break record ????
Floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 07:39 PM   #9
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There are new rules regarding min depth of water for record attempt.

“For every record attempt on a WSSRC approved course, there must be a minimum depth of water, which is defined as follows.
At the time of the run in question, the shallowest part of the course must be covered by water with a depth of at least half the static immersed beam of the craft involved, or 10cm, whichever is the greater. (Guidance note) To define the depth requirement, the craft or board involved should be afloat and the widest part of the hull or hulls touching the water should be measured. In the case of a multihull, the widest hull is measured or hydrofoil if fitted. In the case of an event involving a number of competing craft, the WSSRC Observer can announce at the commencement of the event what the minimum depth requirement will be.”

I don’t now how they will define the depth requirement for kite since I don’t think that kite board floats, at least not with kiteboarder on it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 09:37 PM   #10
davide
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
“For every record attempt on a WSSRC approved course, there must be a minimum depth of water, which is defined as follows.
At the time of the run in question, the shallowest part of the course must be covered by water with a depth of at least half the static immersed beam of the craft involved, or 10cm, whichever is the greater. (Guidance note) T

I don’t now how they will define the depth requirement for kite since I don’t think that kite board floats, at least not with kiteboarder on it.
Yep, At Lüderitz water depth is "10 cm" although the runs are so close to shore that probably water gets even shallower. The rule was a compromise from last year, and frankly I find it a bit absurd. 10 cm is ankle depth and to call "sailing" sailing in conditions in which you cannot even swim is kind of funny. Too bad that such a rule is in the books, I personally would have been much more stringent, and use maybe the world average height for men or women (1.6-1.8 meters) as a minimal depth.

Sailboats are now in even deeper water and it is a gigantic breakthrough.

Last edited by davide; 15th October 2009 at 09:51 PM.
davide is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 05:34 PM.