|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
|
Hi all,
I've just bought a 2006 JP Super X 106l and was blown away on my first outing by it's speed and acceleration. I had the foot-straps in the outboard setting but only on the 3rd (out of 4) most back setting, and can therefore still move both straps about 2cm further back. Does moving the straps further back generally increase maximum speed? I would have imagined so as there would be more lift on the front of the board and less wetted surface area.... Any comments?
__________________
JP Super-X 106l, North F8 Ram: 5.8m, 175cm, 54kg |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: perth west australia sail swan river 3km wide
Posts: 42
|
at your weight 54kg, moving straps to very back position would produce too much board lift, especially in stronger wind. i am another 12kg heavier, i have my backstraps as far forward as possible.
this helps to stop the board from taking off in gusts. ask different sailors and some will say moving straps back is faster, a few will say moving straps forward is faster. at my 66kg i try to reduce the lift of board as much as possible. straps forward,weight in harness forward to nose, smaller fin,lower boom and high hook height all help. a 5.8m at 54kg is quite large. a 4m + 5m will be faster for you if the wind is decent. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
|
Thanks for your advice. I think the same sort of thinking applies for mast track position... further back = more speed but less control due to more lift.
I had a 5.3m until 3 days ago when it got stolen from the place I stored it on the beach... So I'm with a one board and one sail for the moment. I do have a smaller fin though, which I can stick on my board if the wind really picks up to help me gain as much control as possible.
__________________
JP Super-X 106l, North F8 Ram: 5.8m, 175cm, 54kg |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 513
|
JP SX106 has not much power in tail, and is not the most stable in its category. IMHO you will gain very little speed (if any) by moving the straps back. Some shapes work better globally with backward settings because you fly higher over chops. This one has a tendency to take-off already. A smaller fin will have a lot more influence on control and speed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
Cheers.
__________________
JP Super-X 106l, North F8 Ram: 5.8m, 175cm, 54kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14
|
perchè parlate di tavole Jp sul sito starboard??
why talk of JP boards on the site starboard? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
iago - my thoughts exactly
what about Futura or iSonic ?? |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
|
Because unfortunately I only have the money to buy second hand equipment and that a JP board was the best thing on offer. Trust me, if I could've gotten a Futura or even an S-type I would have.
As for posting on this forum, it's the best one on the internet for windsurfing info.
__________________
JP Super-X 106l, North F8 Ram: 5.8m, 175cm, 54kg |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
TEAM
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,241
|
Agrelon,
I find that for your XS weight, a 36 cm fin is way too large with a 5.8 sail. Never run that JP but I did use a Starboard Carve 111 with her stock 32 cm fin and a 5.4 m2 sail but the stock fin was way too large. A 26 cm slalom fin was a perfect setup up to 25 knots for my 65 kg, so I surmise the same should be fine with your 54 kg as well. A 36 cm fin was recommended for a 7.4 m2 sail on the Carve 111 BTW, so I'm pretty sure there is something wrong with your fin sizing setup. Cheers! JM |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
I'm trying a 32cm today, I think it should be much better.Just put side by side, my 36cm and the 32cm seem to have an even bigger difference in size than 4cm, and the 32cm is much lighter. I'll post back on how this setup works. Cheers.
__________________
JP Super-X 106l, North F8 Ram: 5.8m, 175cm, 54kg |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HWR Footstrap position?Remi? | nonopr | Ask Our Team | 6 | 17th December 2010 05:45 AM |
| Footstrap Position and Spinout | agrelon | Free Forum | 0 | 31st January 2010 07:27 PM |
| question about footstrap position | Unregistered | Free Forum | 1 | 29th December 2008 09:29 PM |
| Footstrap position for Isonic 101 | superidis | Kevin`s Corner | 3 | 27th April 2008 12:54 PM |
| Footstrap position for is76 | Tjabo | Ask Our Team | 1 | 7th March 2008 02:31 AM |