|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 248
|
Some impressions after multiple goings with my Is-111 2008 with Hot Sail GPS 7.3 and Tectonics Talon 40.
What a difference the Talon makes in respect to the Drake that originally came with the board! Two things stand out: (1) control, the 111 is my big board but it feels much more agile (easier to change direction in particular) and manageable, (2) spin out resistance: very very hard to spin out, if one induces a spin the recovery is almost immediate Top speed, uptake etc.. is very difficult to measure, although the board feels very smooth at speed and it keeps accelerating very sure-footedly. (1)-(2) above of course increase average speed (and fun) quite a lot. I am quite surprised by the difference in performance, I was expecting to find small differences but it is quite the opposite. Comparison with other top-of-the-line fins (I have Goldwing, Vector Rocket, Mirage) is much harder ... I don't even try although I am selling my Goldwing 36 (drop me an e-mail) to get a bigger Talon. It was indeed a very good idea to deliver the 2010 Isonic without fins, I wander how much better a board like a Futura would go with a top of the line fin. Last edited by davide; 20th March 2010 at 08:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1
|
please tell me what are the application of GPS
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. provides these To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. also To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
|
I too am wondering, as Tectonics are quite cheap compared to other high end fin brands.
Was your previous fin 40cm as well? Would you say the Talons are relatively more powerful for their size than the drake fins? Thanks.
__________________
JP Super-X 106l, North F8 Ram: 5.8m, 175cm, 54kg |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW England,
Posts: 665
|
Hi Agrelon, the Talons have been going great, much better than expected for a large G10 construction. I'm toying with the idea of switching from Select slalom sizes to eithe C3 or Tectonic Talons Here's some info:
http://www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/t...TOPIC_ID=56868
__________________
Cheers - Mark H The toys: iSW44 - - iSW49 - iSW53 - iSW58 - iS107 - iS137 - F161. North Warps: F2011 5.2m, 5.7m, 6.3m, 7m, 8m, 8.6m, 9.5m F2006 11m. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
__________________
JP Super-X 106l, North F8 Ram: 5.8m, 175cm, 54kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
|
Now I'm seriously considering a C3 as a friend might order one with me, so less shipping costs, and apparently the shipping time to Hong Kong is 3-6 days, which is awesome!
Remi seems to swear by these fins, and I've only read fantastic reviews. I'll let you know if I get one what my impressions are.
__________________
JP Super-X 106l, North F8 Ram: 5.8m, 175cm, 54kg |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|