|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 82
|
Hi Remi,
in other thread, you wrote... "iSonic 117 Wide : 8.5 : Ultimate board for light winds for light racers, I consider the 117 as a medium board for very heavy racers." What does it mean? How does lightwind board for light racers differ from medium board for very heavy racers? Which one is better and easier to control in chop? Which one gybes easier? My weight is 80-85kg, and I need a big board for 7.6 and 8.4 sails. It should be better for 7.6, but 8.4 should also work good on this board. Windlimit in races where I participate is 11 knots. Which one should I choose? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 158
|
Hey Marko
At your weight the 7.6/107 would work best. You could also use the 8.4. If you went for the 117,it would be the other way around.
__________________
Regards Maximus Isonic 97 2013 JP Speed 50 2014 Severne Reflex 4 7.0,6.2,5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 82
|
Hi Maximus!
I forgot to mention that we mostly race in very gusty winds where big sail is required to go thru lulls. I find it much easier to hold the big sail in strong gusts with wider board than with narrower, and bigger board is also faster thru lulls. So 107 is not really an option for real world racing with 8.4 in light winds ![]() Lets say that I need a board for 8.4 for 10-20kts and for 7.6 for 13-25(28)kts. Which one is easier to gybe and control in chop? 117 or 117wide? Is there much difference in marginal 8.4 conditions? Or 117wide is better only with 9+ sails? Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
STARBOARD DEVELOPMENT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2,334
|
Hi Marko,
We introduce the iSonic 117 Wide because their was a missing board for weigth around 80 kgs and under as light wind board. This board is basically a small version of the iSonic 131 and thinner with all the 2011 improvement In your case I will recommand you the 117 Wide who is specially design for your request. The 117 have V for more high winds orientation while the 117 Wide have mono concave at 30 and 60 like the 127 to improve the performances in light winds but still perfect to be use with 7.6. By the way jibbing is better on the 117 wide with his more round outline. You can see here some photos of the iSonic 117 Wide in action with 7.8 or 8.6 : http://www.facebook.com/remi.vila?v=...0&id=699380806 All the best
__________________
Rémi Can answer if you have any questions on this following boards : Carve 111, 121, 131, 141, 151 & 161 Futura 93, 101, 111, 121, 131 & 141. iSonic 80, 87, 90, 97, 107, 110, 117, 127 & 137 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. UltraSonic 147 Formula Experience One Design Phantom Race 377/320 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Phantom 295 : To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Formula 167 & 167 Wide : To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Racing Serinity Cat Concept To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Last edited by Remi; 7th September 2010 at 09:47 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| question for Remi: iSonic 131 shape similar to 144? | marekk | Ask Our Team | 1 | 17th April 2010 06:57 PM |
| Question for Remi, iSonic 131 footstraps? | nonopr | Ask Our Team | 2 | 20th October 2009 10:10 PM |
| Question pour Remi: Isonic 101 & 122, quels ailerons? | Terminator | French Forum | 23 | 21st April 2009 11:41 PM |
| Question for Remi. iSonic 133 vs. iSonic 150? | Grant | Ask Our Team | 9 | 7th August 2008 01:30 AM |
| Question to Ian and Remi on iSonic 145/155 | paulk | Ask Our Team | 11 | 2nd September 2006 09:45 AM |