Isonic 94/111 2010 real volume? - Page 2

Marko · 19th August 2009, 06:44 PM

Vando, thanks for the pics and is94 info!

I am looking forward for your report after riding your new boards a little bit more. I am interested a lot in is86-is94 comparison, especially in rough conditions.

Remi, in the past, I liked is101 more then is86 in very choppy (small messy chop) and gusty winds. It was a little slower but much calmer, less technical and easier to jibe. Can I expect that is94 would be even more controllable in chop with 5.5 then my older is101 2007?

Cheers

Ken · 19th August 2009, 10:19 PM

Remi,

Thanks for the confirmation about the board specifications. It't good to know that the volumes are "actual" and not "virtual". This is a good move for Starboard. Thanks,

Ken

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

19th August 2009, 06:44 PM	#11
Marko Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 82	Vando, thanks for the pics and is94 info! I am looking forward for your report after riding your new boards a little bit more. I am interested a lot in is86-is94 comparison, especially in rough conditions. Remi, in the past, I liked is101 more then is86 in very choppy (small messy chop) and gusty winds. It was a little slower but much calmer, less technical and easier to jibe. Can I expect that is94 would be even more controllable in chop with 5.5 then my older is101 2007? Cheers

19th August 2009, 10:19 PM	#12
Ken Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas USA Posts: 797	Remi, Thanks for the confirmation about the board specifications. It't good to know that the volumes are "actual" and not "virtual". This is a good move for Starboard. Thanks, Ken