|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
|
Has anyone tried both the 2010 Starboard iSonics and the 2010 Exocet Warp-Sl and can make any comments?
I bring this up because the weight of the Exocets is really low and I wanted to know how they performed compared to the iSonics.
__________________
JP Super-X 106l, North F8 Ram: 5.8m, 175cm, 54kg |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 513
|
Hello Agrelon. I tried the Warp SL 66 2009 recently, which is the same as 2010 I think. It is very light indeed (~6 Kgs) nervous, undoubtly fast but feels very stiff even in moderate chops. The most astounding is its ability to keep planing in almost no wind. I haven't tried it in rough conditions yet but suspect you may find it uncomfortable at your weight (or even at mine). From what I read these boards would feel more like wood/carbon iSonic's.
Last edited by Farlo; 12th November 2009 at 06:55 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| *board 162 vs Exocet Warp Formula | dymatize | Free Forum | 2 | 12th December 2008 10:51 PM |
| new exocet warp fw vs 162 | Unregistered | Free Forum | 1 | 17th February 2008 10:22 PM |
| Hesitating between AE117 and Exocet Cross 117 ? | cori | Ask Our Team | 1 | 11th May 2007 07:30 PM |
| Kombat 117 vs Exocet cross 118/117 | cori | Free Forum | 2 | 23rd November 2006 01:50 PM |
| SB Hybrid Carve and Phantom VS. Kona Exocet | GEN | Ask Our Team | 6 | 24th August 2006 12:40 PM |