Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31st March 2010, 03:49 AM   #1
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default could this be of any use to board/fin design?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35954556...ience-science/
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2010, 07:01 AM   #2
joe_windsurfer
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montréal (PQ) CANADA
Posts: 211
Default

.
maybe that was the intention of the F2 air tubes ?
except they put in air
perhaps water injection would be better ?
__________________
joe windsurfer @ 100 kg
2006 AHD type-F FF 160/79cm, 2012 JP SLW92, 2000 Fanatic BEE 124 LTD + Mistral Equipe I LCS
HSM Fire 6.3, Gaastra Flow 3x 7.0, TR-6 8.4, TR4 10.0

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
joe_windsurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2010, 11:14 AM   #3
kiwiben
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Smile

This is not rocket science folks... Okay maybe it is... but I am sorry to report that it cannot help us because there is no turbulence around a windsurfing fin.

Actually I just made that up... but I think the stuff in the article is concerned with "gross turbulence" caused by a fairly inefficient shape... not the micro, nay, nano-turbulence you could imagine goes on at the surface of a fin when some nerd has devoted his/her life to eliminating every last shred of turbulence from it.

But at the risk of being a dream stealer, could you imagine little tiny water pipes firing little nano-jets of water out of the leading edge of the fin? I suppose it is possible but I think the fin would cost about twenty grand... but then again, as they say: If you build it, they will come!

However, there is another way of adding turbulence, the so-called shark-skin effect (so called by me just then)... Sharks have rough skin, and scientists discovered to their amazement that shark skin generates less turbulence (or maybe that should be drag or friction)) than the smooth skin of, say, a dolphin. Their theory was the little nano turbulences created by the tiny roughnesses meant the actual water could never properly "Grip" the surface to get any major turbulence resonating. I think Dennis Connor gave his Americas Cup yacht a rough hull once going on this concept. I wonder if any W/S designers have explored a roughened bottom surface. If they did, it didn't seem to catch on...

Last edited by kiwiben; 31st March 2010 at 11:18 AM. Reason: not long and boring enough
kiwiben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2010, 08:07 PM   #4
Farlo
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 531
Default

Sorry to interfere but it is rocket science. Hull or fin surface can vary from polished to matte to rough and there is no definitive answer about what is best (notwithstanding what "best" means). Most probably it depends on many other parameters. Nanostructured materials are an interesting breakthrough as water hardly touch them, there is no surface energy or boundary layer in the classical sense. But there are probably too expensive/fragile for windsurf.
Farlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Design suggestion : one board and rig for all ZedZdeD Ask Our Team 4 25th August 2009 05:47 AM
restoring the board design bia Free Forum 0 19th May 2009 04:54 AM
Board Design or Physics ? Unregistered Free Forum 10 8th April 2009 03:04 PM
formula one design Unregistered Free Forum 22 7th March 2009 07:59 AM
Design differences Ricbra Free Forum 3 1st December 2006 07:56 AM


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 11:21 PM.