|
|
#11 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 70
|
I think that Ken has a point about Formulas planning earlier than Slalom boards - everyone confirms that! I tried to sail one, but I thought it akward - do also prefer the iS150 or the new Light Wind boards
![]() We have had a great discussion on the drivers of "light wind planning" in another thread. Some would even recommend you to go with the SB Phantom Raceboards, which can glide with ease in light winds and can certainly sail at extreme upwind angles (given their large daggerboard). Yet there was a lot of conversation on a statement made that Raceboards are more appropriate than Formula or large Slalom Boards for light-wind conditions: Quote:
According to Remi: "This board cannot be used in the PWA rules but it's the perfect link between Slalom and Formula. For those who don't like Formula and prefer the glide sensation of an iSonic, it's the perfect machine for light winds with a sail around 10m". See also part of the quote from MarkH's comments... Quote:
![]() Bottom-line that is a different board than a Formula and is definitely NOT planning earlier! I am currently split between iS150 and another brand's light-wind board... |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
|
Hmm, from this photo it doesn't look as huge as I thought it would be. I can see how the shape is somewhat a transition to formula.
__________________
JP Super-X 106l, North F8 Ram: 5.8m, 175cm, 54kg |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|