Go Back   Starboard Forums > Ask Our Team

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14th May 2010, 10:41 AM   #1
aa25
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 20
Default Kode 86 (wood) upgrade to woodcarbon or Flare 98?

Hi, I'm 74 kg and use the Kode 86 for a lot of 5.4 to 4.5 cross-onshore freeride/freestyle/wave type sailing in fairly choppy water. These are common summer seabreeze conditions which tend to support a style of sailing I like that is a combo over everything - freeride blast, throw some loops and freestyle, ride some small bay waves. The Kode86 (wood) seems to work very well for this, but the weight is the only issue I have which tends to restrain these aerial moves a bit and perhaps reduce some early planing. The board fires once the wind is solid 5.4 or 4.5 for me; it is a bit slow and underpowered at lighter 5.4 wind (prob due to being 86l). On the other hand, its weight provides inertia which, once at speed, provides good lift in jumps and lull-coasting. I ride a 71 quad once it gets solid 4.5 or less or in cross-off waves. This board rips.
My question is around whether I'd be better upgrading to woodcarbon Kode 86 for the lightness benefits or would perhaps a wc Flare 98 cover this sort of sailing better, especially for the 5.4 sailing? I guess having a Flare 98 and my 71 quad would be a good combo, but does the Flare still allow some small waveriding in these more onshore conditions, with it's high volume tail? The problem is once on my 4.5 these conditions (with waist high bay waves) are great for looping and both backside/frontside riding where the Kode86 rips.
I guess another option could be Flare 98 and then get a Kode80 for when it's stronger and keep 71 quad for proper waves and nuking winds.
I'd much appreciated some advice. cheers Andy.
aa25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2010, 01:30 PM   #2
Ola_H
TEAM
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,191
Default

I don't think the wood Kode 86 is particularly heavy mean weight comes in at 6.2kg and flare 98 wood carbon will not be much lighter. But due to both bigger size, more width and tail width and a flatter rocker, the Flare 98 will fore sure still get going a bit earlier in underpowered 5.4 and regarding jumping ("popping") in such conditions the difference will be even more noticable (in favor of the Flare 98). So if this is something you truly value I think adding a Flare 98 can for sure improve your light wind sailing.

But unfortunately, I doubt you will like it very much for any type of wave sailing (except for pure freestyle sailing in waves). Wave _riding_ will simply be rather bad, far, far from the Kode 86.

I see a few different solutions. Getting a Kode 80 is one, but it's a fairly small 80 liter board and although it has a faster and "crisper" feel to it than your Q71, I don't think it's that much better in light wind wave sailing. It's a board that prefer a bit more power to work its best in wave riding. In that case, I figure keeping the Kode 86 would be better.

Another option is to try to explore the light wind abilities of the Q71 a bit more. It' not a super small board for you and when you get the hang of it I think it can take a 5.4 when it has to. Bit this is a bit borderline, and hence one option would be to ad a powerful 5.0 to your sail quiver. Then you could really take the most out of the light wind abilities of the Q71. 71 liters may sound small, but it is a very wide 71 liter board, with a lot of fin too, so its light wind potential is quite big. It will not give the blasting feel of a Kode 86 (or 80) but its still amazing upwind, rides waves very well and has a very nice "pop" for getting height off small waves due to all that fin drive.

So, depending a bit on the economics, I would first look for a Flare 98. Then experiment more with the Q71 in light wind wave sailing, first with the 5.4 and if that feels awkward, with a powerful 5.0. Depending on how that works, you might then sell off the Kode 86...or keep it if you still like to get back to that blasting feel now and then. In any case, I figure a Kode80 and Q71 in practice are closer than Kode 86 and Flare 98 is.

(I'm about your weight by the way, and have sailed all these boards, except for the latest generation Flare both in waves and on lakes. I did sail the previous Flare though.)
Ola_H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2010, 02:29 PM   #3
aa25
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 20
Default

Thanks. I think that sounds good to try a 5.0 on the 71 quad. The springy pop of the quad is pretty good as you mention; quite a satisfying feeling.

For cross-shore wavesailing, I'll only ever be on the quad71 and from 5.0 down. For bay conditions, Flare98 5.4-5.0 then Quad71 5.0 down.

I think it sounds like the Flare 98 will cover me better for 5.4 to 5.0 conditions.
The Kode86 needs power so reaches its prime for me at powered 5.4 to powered 5.0 when I could be on 5.0 with the 71 anyway.
aa25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Decision?!?! take either the Flare 2009 (in Wood-Carbon) or 2010 (Wood) Unregistered Free Forum 7 22nd April 2010 01:26 AM
wood for more control woodcarbon for more lowend performance ???????? van Ask Our Team 9 10th September 2009 02:58 AM
Flare 88 or Kode 86 Selly154 Ask Our Team 1 12th May 2009 02:00 PM
meilleur aileron pour flare 98 woodcarbon ? charlier French Forum 0 15th March 2009 06:26 PM
flare 2007 wood deck morisios Ask Our Team 3 12th September 2008 09:48 AM


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 12:53 PM.