|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 27
|
I am gonna buy a new board this year and I found 2 boards. One of them is iSonic 86 wood(2009)(600€) and one of them is iSonic 86 woodcarbon(2010)(700€). I am gonna use this board in 18 knots+ and I'm 73 kg. Which board would be better for me?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 22
|
Isonic 2010&2009 exist only in wood.
You should go for the 86 and not the slim. I feel confortable with the 86 above a steady 22 knots with 6.2. For 18 knots and your weigth I would not recommend the slim. Cheers Seb |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 27
|
But a racer in here said the iSonic 86 slim is easier to jibe, easier to control and faster
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 22
|
He must be right. But at 18 knots and in a racing context I would go for the one with more volume. Outside of racing and if it's more for fun, the slim is probably the way to go for high winds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
STARBOARD DEVELOPMENT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2,339
|
Hi emir633,
Even you are quiet light at 18 knots is not the 86 Slim to go, this board is more for over 20 and for me at 90 kgs I used it at 25 knots and more in chopy condition. Steve Allen at 80 kgs use the iSonic 86 Slim in the PWA but not under 25 knots. Hope this help All the best
__________________
Rémi Can answer if you have any questions on this following boards : Carve 111, 121, 131, 141, 151 & 161 Futura 93, 101, 111, 121, 131 & 141. iSonic 80, 87, 90, 97, 107, 110, 117, 127 & 137 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. UltraSonic 147 Formula Experience One Design Phantom Race 377/320 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Phantom 295 : To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Formula 167 & 167 Wide : To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Racing Serinity Cat Concept To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
TEAM
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,191
|
I asked Taty Frans to comment (75kg) and he said he strongly recommended the regular 86 for 18+. Only at 25/30knots+ he would take the SLim, he wrote.
I'm 72 myself and have the regular 86. I'm only freesaling on it (no competitions) but I'd say it's and EXCELLENT and super easy jibing board. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Test isonic 86/86 slim 2010 | Christine | French Forum | 14 | 8th May 2012 08:19 PM |
| isonic 87 2007 VS isonic 86 2010 and sail problem | IOANNHS | Ask Our Team | 3 | 27th May 2010 02:51 AM |
| Question for Remi. iSonic 133 vs. iSonic 150? | Grant | Ask Our Team | 9 | 7th August 2008 01:30 AM |
| Super Slim? | Philip | Ask Our Team | 0 | 2nd February 2008 11:15 AM |
| Isonic 94 (2006-7) v Isonic 96 (2007-8) | rayberg | Ask Our Team | 0 | 24th November 2007 09:20 AM |