15th January 2012, 06:30 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 30
|
Rear footstrap position.
This one is for the designers. I notice on the larger Futura's and now the Carve's the rear footstrap holes are not parallel with the centre line ( stringer line in surfing terms ). The front holes are placed wider from the centre line than the rear holes. When I had a 2008 Futura 133 I constantly hit my toes on the leading edge of the footstrap. All other board brands I looked at thus far have them parallel. Also my Kode 113 is parallel.
The odd thing is that on the Isonic 117 I now have, the footstraps are parallel to the centre line. In my opinion a lot better and the width is very similar. Why one style on the isonic and a another on the freerides? 
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| '09 - '10 kode 112 single rear footstrap? | Unregistered | Free Forum | 5 | 14th November 2010 03:53 AM |
| Futura's rear footstrap position | gu77 | Ask Our Team | 1 | 28th October 2007 05:17 PM |
| One rear footstrap on Kombat? | gu77 | Ask Our Team | 7 | 26th September 2007 11:15 AM |
| Rear footstrap position on Kombat | gu77 | Ask Our Team | 0 | 23rd August 2007 06:14 PM |
| That pesky rear footstrap | Matthew | Windsurfing School | 9 | 26th September 2006 10:54 PM |
Linear Mode
