Go Back   Starboard Forums > Ask Our Team

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15th January 2012, 06:30 PM   #1
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 32
Default Rear footstrap position.

This one is for the designers. I notice on the larger Futura's and now the Carve's the rear footstrap holes are not parallel with the centre line ( stringer line in surfing terms ). The front holes are placed wider from the centre line than the rear holes. When I had a 2008 Futura 133 I constantly hit my toes on the leading edge of the footstrap. All other board brands I looked at thus far have them parallel. Also my Kode 113 is parallel.

The odd thing is that on the Isonic 117 I now have, the footstraps are parallel to the centre line. In my opinion a lot better and the width is very similar.

Why one style on the isonic and a another on the freerides?
Ulf is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'09 - '10 kode 112 single rear footstrap? Unregistered Free Forum 5 14th November 2010 03:53 AM
Futura's rear footstrap position gu77 Ask Our Team 1 28th October 2007 05:17 PM
One rear footstrap on Kombat? gu77 Ask Our Team 7 26th September 2007 11:15 AM
Rear footstrap position on Kombat gu77 Ask Our Team 0 23rd August 2007 06:14 PM
That pesky rear footstrap Matthew Windsurfing School 9 26th September 2006 10:54 PM

All times are GMT +7. The time now is 10:43 PM.