Old 10th August 2007, 03:53 AM   #1
Madis
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 37
Send a message via MSN to Madis
Default Signature

heh what do u think of this signature?
i was bored and made it ^^
Madis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2007, 03:54 AM   #2
Madis
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 37
Send a message via MSN to Madis
Default RE: Signature

PS! Taty there with the 2008 flare
Madis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2007, 04:42 AM   #3
windsurferdagg
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 197
Send a message via MSN to windsurferdagg
Default RE: Signature

man I still can't figure out how to get an avatar... let alone get a picture in the signature...

does the avatar need to be exactly 100 by 100 pixels?
windsurferdagg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2007, 04:51 AM   #4
Madis
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 37
Send a message via MSN to Madis
Default RE: Signature

well yeah, i can modify the avatar for you, just send me the picture my avatars actual size :

and the signature:
Madis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2007, 05:00 AM   #5
windsurferdagg
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 197
Send a message via MSN to windsurferdagg
Default RE: Signature

hmmm... alright, I will have to think about the pic I want to use. If I don't get it in 15 minutes, I will send'em over

Thanks a lot

thomas
windsurferdagg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2007, 06:21 AM   #6
mark h
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW England,
Posts: 706
Default RE: Signature

Just testing to see if my pis is there now.
mark h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2007, 06:57 AM   #7
steveC
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 639
Default RE: Signature

Hi Madis,

In the latest post above, You've presented some interesting shots. However, I would lose the "Madis" signatures in the frame of some of the photos. In these type of scenarios, the photo guy can claim his "stamp" by locating it outside the frame of reference , as this is the proper and accepted balance between the photographer and subject. Outside of the intimate circumstances between the photographer and subject, a design guy must rely on higher levels of recognition that aren't always readily apparent in the individual images themselves.

Not trying to be too negative here, but that's more in line with accepted protocol.
steveC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2007, 08:54 AM   #8
windsurferdagg
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 197
Send a message via MSN to windsurferdagg
Default RE: Signature

I must have read wrong, I tried soo many times to get that avatar up. Just realized that it has to be exaclty 100 by 100 pixels. So if you have photoshop, just crop the image, and great image size to 100 by 100 pixels...

and mark h? nice typo ;-) your pis isn't there now :-)

Thomas
windsurferdagg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2007, 10:32 PM   #9
Madis
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 37
Send a message via MSN to Madis
Default RE: Signature

Quote:
steveC wrote:
Hi Madis,

In the latest post above, You've presented some interesting shots. However, I would lose the "Madis" signatures in the frame of some of the photos. In these type of scenarios, the photo guy can claim his "stamp" by locating it outside the frame of reference , as this is the proper and accepted balance between the photographer and subject. Outside of the intimate circumstances between the photographer and subject, a design guy must rely on higher levels of recognition that aren't always readily apparent in the individual images themselves.

Not trying to be too negative here, but that's more in line with accepted protocol.
Come to think of it, I agree with you, so i lost the "Madis" ^^

Thanks!
Madis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 07:49 AM.