Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9th January 2008, 05:41 PM   #1
northeast
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Default Is it technora or wood for dedicated (non-professional) windsurfers?

Hi everybody,

Is the advantage in "weight-to-strength and impact-resistance ratio" -
that wood technology offers compared to technora -
as important to professional windsurfers as to non-professional
ones (dedicated sailors, sailing as much as work permits)?

Or is it the price of the boards (technology) that is
the only important difference in deciding technora or wood?

Thank you all!
northeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2008, 11:41 PM   #2
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wood does feel a bit nicer and is a bit lighter but wider boards breaks quite easy (>70 cm on, smaller boards don't break easy though) and is very difficult/expensive to repair. Another thing is that wood boards suffer more during daily temperature changes (day/night) than technora which automatically spells out a shorter lifespan.

If you need the utmost performance and are willing to sacrifice durability -> wood
If you want peace of mind and a "don't bother just fix it and get back on the water" life -> technora

Wood is very nice but it comes at a cost
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2008, 12:39 AM   #3
Phill104
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 297
Default

Who says wood is less durable to temperature changes. I'm sure a 200yr old pine tree would disagree if it could talk.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
All the latest windsurfing news in one place.
Phill104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2008, 04:21 PM   #4
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

sure if it were still alive!
boards widen and narrow during temperature changes, not somethign thats really good. There is a reason they say wood "works".
technora just is'nt affected as much (ask it ).
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2008, 07:42 PM   #5
Randy
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 55
Default

I've got a wood Hypersonic 105 with close to 150 sessions on it. Its one of the most durable boards I've ever owned and I don't think its hard to repair. Sure, to replace the wood would be hard, but for the few dings I've had marine tex and a layer of glass or two and a nice sticker makes it look fine.
Randy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2008, 10:04 PM   #6
carvesalot
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Niobrara
Posts: 109
Default

For the sailor you describe the money difference is probably not worth it, the wood version will be lighter, so plane sooner. Lots of time we dont have the luxury to pick either one or the other, unless its a new 2008 board, and if you are considering a 2008 you can probably afford either. I have felt that my lightweight boards are more fragile, only to be told that the material used is stronger and light weight as well, hence the additional cost. I dont think repair would be more difficult 1 VS the other, unless its a limited production, like they made some hollow *Boards.
__________________
good winds
carvesalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2008, 01:43 AM   #7
northeast
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Default

Thank you all for your replies.
northeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 10:35 AM.