Go Back   Starboard Forums > Free Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23rd December 2008, 10:34 PM   #1
Rambo
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 14
Default Formula 161 vs 162

Hy evrybody,
There's a lot of discusions about 161 vs 162. One thing I never read: what are the real diffences between them?
I mean scoop rockerline / bottomshape / V (or zero V?) from nose to tail / volumefrom nose tot tail. Of course starboard is really working these things out working on the formula 163.

Greatz, Rambo.
Rambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th December 2008, 12:06 AM   #2
michelb
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chile, Santiago
Posts: 92
Send a message via MSN to michelb
Default

It`s a nice question, also Remi said that you can ask for both as new ( 2009 models). And also 160 ( but only in FE)...

Remi, in wich cases ( rider heigth,wheigth, sail maker) you reccomend 162 or 161?

Thanks,
Michel
F161, but looking for 162 or FOD package.
michelb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2008, 04:22 PM   #3
pfaffi
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Austria - Lake Neusiedler, closed Vienna
Posts: 136
Send a message via Skype™ to pfaffi
Default

in the row starting from 158, 159, 160 and 161 there was no big differenz in fastest surf style, adjustments and best fin.
The 162 broke that row. It needs different riding style (keep it flat and fast) and powerful fin which was never needed so strong before.
I am 90kg and 185cm and like that board more than the 161 bacause I am faster/higher/deeper than my friends. My friends use mainly the 161 but they are less tall than me.
The main point for me was exclusive training for longer time on the 162 to get the new feeling and finding the correct powerful fin.
pfaffi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2008, 06:24 PM   #4
michelb
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chile, Santiago
Posts: 92
Send a message via MSN to michelb
Default

Thanks again Peter!!
michelb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2008, 09:55 PM   #5
Papounet
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 213
Default

If you are heavy, have time for deep training, have cash for a Kashy => Enjoy the F162 (-:
Papounet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009, 01:13 PM   #6
pfaffi
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Austria - Lake Neusiedler, closed Vienna
Posts: 136
Send a message via Skype™ to pfaffi
Default

Hi Papounet!
Its not only Kashy fins which are working with 162. Thats to simple. You need a tipsoft (bending) and a very twist stiff (torsion) fin with a wide tip (area) and raked (+9 or app. 3,5 deg. angle at the leading edge).
BR pfaffi
pfaffi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009, 01:35 PM   #7
NWF
www.nationalwatersportsfestival.com
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Hayling Island Hampshire England
Posts: 99
Default

What other fins are working well on the 162 apart from the very expensive, very hard to get Kashy fins?
__________________
Allan Cross
National Watersports Festival (NWF)

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

GBR68

The toys!

Starboard
2014 Kode Wave 87 (W), 2014 Kode 103 (W), 2014 AtomIQ 100/110, 2014 ISonic 90 (W), 107 & 117 (C) 2013 UltraSonic 147 (C)


Severne
2013 Blade 4.2, 4.7 and 5.3, 2013 Gator 6.0, 2013 NCX 5.5, 2014 NCX 6.5, 7.0 2013 NCX 7.5 Pro 2014 Reflex R5 5.6, 6.2, 7.0, 7.8, 8.6 Overdrive R5 9.5
NWF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009, 04:53 PM   #8
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

For the 08 season I had a Hurricane 5B soft-- (630 I think), a Kashy 70 XS, a Finworks LT and a Finworks Pro (for hi-wind) in my fin quiver for the 162.

All the fins are working very good and competitively on the 162. I guess a Hurricane FRB6 would be a good choice also.

The fin I used the most were the Finworks LT and then the Kashy and Hurricane almost the same amount of time.

As Pfaffi mentioned it's definetly not just Kashy fins that is working on the 162. It's without a doubt a very good fin but you can also get excellent performance from other brands...

Best regards and a Happy New Year to all.

Ths
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009, 07:15 PM   #9
pfaffi
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Austria - Lake Neusiedler, closed Vienna
Posts: 136
Send a message via Skype™ to pfaffi
Default

have an look to Hurricane Homepage:
http://www.hurricanefins.de/
as I mentioned:
soft (flex, bending), stiff in twist, more surface (area, specially in the tip) than needed with the 161 and more raked. Additional a more fat profile (9-10%) is a advantage.
BR pfaffi
pfaffi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +7. The time now is 06:43 AM.